https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Walter Bright from comment #2)
> Consider:
>
> struct S { ~this(); }
> struct T { S s; }
>
> The compiler will automatically create a destructor for T that will call the
> destructor for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Walter Bright from comment #1)
> In C++:
>
> struct S { ~S(); };
> union U { S s; };
>
> g++ -c foo.cpp
> foo.cpp:2:14: error: member 'S U::s' with destructor not allowed in union
> un
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
--- Comment #2 from Walter Bright ---
Consider:
struct S { ~this(); }
struct T { S s; }
The compiler will automatically create a destructor for T that will call the
destructor for s, or will add code to do that to the destructor for T.
union
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
Issue ID: 16104
Summary: Unions should allow fields with destructors,
postblits, and invariants
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Stat
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16098
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--- Comment #1 from Ke
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16085
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16102
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
Summary|st
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16102
Oleg B changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16103
Issue ID: 16103
Summary: DDOC module-level function list descriptions refer to
unknown parameter names
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
St
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16102
Issue ID: 16102
Summary: struct dtor replace value on stack
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16085
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Imported name causes lookup |wrong visibility warning
|d
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16101
Issue ID: 16101
Summary: ddoc inserts empty section with newline
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priorit
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16100
--- Comment #1 from Johan Engelen ---
Also fails with DMD 2.068.2.
(important: "-O" must be used, without "-O" it works)
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16100
Issue ID: 16100
Summary: Error with -O of struct enumeration value and comma
operator
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16099
Issue ID: 16099
Summary: Inconsistent rules for overloading lambdas
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16085
--- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #5)
> > The issue is subtler than that (I'd agree the snippet above is a clear cut).
> > The thing is Bucketizer _a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16085
--- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #5)
> The issue is subtler than that (I'd agree the snippet above is a clear cut).
> The thing is Bucketizer _also_ defines its own reallocate:
Ah, I was already wond
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16085
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15857
--- Comment #8 from Jacob Carlborg ---
This is not fixed in v2.071.1-b2.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16098
Issue ID: 16098
Summary: align(32) not respected for stack variables
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: C++, SIMD
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16087
--- Comment #2 from Marco Leise ---
Ok, different sources report that major compilers (llvm, gcc, icc) respect
alignments >= 16 on the stack. I'll open a separate issue for that.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
Issue ID: 16097
Summary: Confusing error message when concatenating
const(char)*
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Se
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16093
Max Samukha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
--- Comment #3 from Max Samukha ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16096
Issue ID: 16096
Summary: Linking to static library: can't parse
__DATA/__objc_imageinfo
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Mac OS X
Status: N
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16095
Issue ID: 16095
Summary: a delegate can mutate immutable data
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16089
Bastiaan Veelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16094
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
29 matches
Mail list logo
