https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--- Comment #9 from Mike Franklin ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #8)
> Just because Phobos follows the convention of putting the "return" parameter
> as the first parameter, does that mean the language should require it?
I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #9 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #8)
> > @safe code can mess with it
>
> No it can't, that's the point of @safe. Mess with it how?
@safe applies to functions/methods, not variables/fields. You can't forbid
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #8 from Atila Neves ---
> @safe code can mess with it
No it can't, that's the point of @safe. Mess with it how?
> Why shouldn't this compile? There's no `scope` anywhere now (except maybe an
> inferred one)
Function template =>
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #7 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #6)
> What's @trusted is that I'm calling `free` on the same pointer I allocated
> in the constructor, and the other thing needing checking is the postblit.
If you want to keep
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #6 from Atila Neves ---
I typed the code from memory and made a mistake. Yes, it's supposed to be
`.ptr`. There's no way I can call core.stdc.stdlib.free without @trusted
_somewhere_, since `free` isn't @safe - free(42) is obviously
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #8
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #5 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #4)
> I made a mistake when I posted the code. This compiles but shouldn't (the
> only difference is removing `scope` from the destructor).
[...]
> @safe:
>
> const(int)*
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
Atila Neves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||atila.ne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
--- Comment #4 from anonymous4 ---
@safe:
struct A(T)
{
int[] r;
this(int[] q){r=q;}
}
int[] escape(T)(int[] r)
{
return A!int(r).r;
}
int[] f()
{
int[6] xs = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
return xs.escape!int;
}
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
--- Comment #3 from anonymous4 ---
Reduced:
@safe:
struct A(alias fun)
{
int[] r;
this(int[] q){r=q;}
}
template m(alias fun)
{
auto m(int[] r)
{
return A!fun(r);
}
}
auto foo() {
int[6] xs = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18051
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/6a0a91a8135cc0ce10253c23e788b0782bce165e
Use version(TestComplex) as a workaround against issue
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/1798119abff6b7226ad65ce57339a26f0ab0bf4e
Fix issue 19162
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #4 from Atila Neves ---
I made a mistake when I posted the code. This compiles but shouldn't (the only
difference is removing `scope` from the destructor).
I also surrounded the call to `free` with @trusted instead of the whole
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #2 from Atila Neves ---
I used dmd 2.081.2. I just tried it again and it compiles. Just in case there's
something wrong with the Arch Linux package, I used dmd.081.2 from install.sh.
Same result. I also tried the 2.082.0 beta 1. Same
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18545
--- Comment #1 from FeepingCreature ---
It turns out what's happening here is that cast() constNullable is equivalent
to Nullable(constNullable)... which implicitly casts to constNullable.get.
alias get this strikes again!
Nullable should maybe
20 matches
Mail list logo
