https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23679
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23545
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15985
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16603
kdevel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde...@vogtner.de
--- Comment #3 from kdevel ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23679
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23679
Dennis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkor...@live.nl
Hardware|x86_64
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23679
Issue ID: 23679
Summary: 2147483647 does not exceed 0x7fff
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23678
Issue ID: 23678
Summary: Contracts are compiled with release switch?
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23676
--- Comment #3 from Bradley Chatha ---
Marking the nested function as @safe prevents the error message; allows the
compilation to succeed, however the compiler does still hang for a while before
it finishes.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23676
--- Comment #2 from Bradley Chatha ---
Even more strangely: If you delete any line within the body of the case
statement that is guarded by the fault `static if`, compilation succeeds.
What a very strange edge case this is hitting.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23676
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23677
Issue ID: 23677
Summary: log1p Documentation Doesn't Match Implementation
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16603
--- Comment #2 from Kevin ---
1) The technical language specification which one would use to build a parser
is still incorrect, regardless of any flavour text in the description.
2) you only addressed the second part of the issue, completely
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23676
Issue ID: 23676
Summary: Compilation differences w/ braceless vs brace-full
static if within switch statement
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Mac OS
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21821
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23675
Dennis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkor...@live.nl
--- Comment #1 from Dennis ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23675
Issue ID: 23675
Summary: Error on direct double.NaN comparison
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23387
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23675
Bolpat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qs.il.paperi...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16603
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20781
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
21 matches
Mail list logo