[Issue 10201] "= void" initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2016-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to Dicebot from comment #6) > There is no array bounds checking in that example as `arr.ptr` syntax is > used. You're right. But it's marked @trusted anyway, which defeats

[Issue 10201] "= void" initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2016-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 --- Comment #7 from Dicebot --- I do agree with closing it for now though, as the issue is unlikely to cause any trouble in real code and thus is not worth major attention. --

[Issue 10201] "= void" initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2016-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 --- Comment #6 from Dicebot --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #4) > (In reply to monarchdodra from comment #2) > > I mentioned this in > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1434#issuecomment- > >

[Issue 10201] "= void" initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2016-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 10201] "= void" initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2016-06-07 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||safe

[Issue 10201] = void initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2013-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 10201] = void initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2013-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 10201] = void initialization should not be allowed in @safe

2013-05-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10201 --- Comment #1 from Dicebot m.stras...@gmail.com 2013-05-29 08:42:06 PDT --- Additional explanation - it does report an error if initialized value is a pointer or contains a pointer. It does not report an error if value has disabled