[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2019-11-02 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 Nicholas Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2017-07-22 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 Ali Cehreli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acehr...@yahoo.com --- Comment #12 from Ali Ce

[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2014-01-07 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 --- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-01-07 18:22:31 PST --- Eventually the operators should be also removed from this page: http://dlang.org/lex.html -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2013-12-19 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-12-19 04:25:12 PST --- Commits pushed to 2.065 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/97cebadfc75a332d79d00fc31e1ceed709813

[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2013-12-12 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-12-12 19:07:47 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/97cebadfc75a332d79d00fc31e1ceed709813

[Issue 10369] Deprecate unordered floating point comparisons (!<>=, etc) and later remove them

2013-11-22 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-22 02:46:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Is the phobos sort good enough to replace it? IIRC there were some > problems... I have answered in Issue 10318 -- Configure issuemail: htt