[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 --- Comment #3 from Nick Treleaven --- > the bug might not even be reproducible Oops, the original bug also violates safety anyway. The above comment combined with the original example means that any enum value outside its min and max properties

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@geany.org --- Comment #2 from Nick

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 Radu Racariu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||safe

[Issue 14643] Safety violation with final switch and void initializer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14643 --- Comment #1 from Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv --- correction : foo() needs to be called twice to start getting garbage on stack --