https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
--- Comment #6 from Jack Stouffer ---
(In reply to Carsten Blüggel from comment #5)
> Did I miss anything or why is this issue still an open regression?
The idea is that it shouldn't have been an error, but a deprecation. Since
we're a couple of rel
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
Carsten Blüggel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
Carsten Blüggel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chi...@posteo.net
--- Comment #5 from Cars
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
--- Comment #4 from Johan Engelen ---
So not a compiler bug then?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright ---
It's never been legal to take the address of a 'ref' in @safe code - it's a
compiler bug that that was ever allowed. The compiler will allow it if bar() is
marked as @trusted.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||safe
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jackstouffer.com
--- Comment #2 from Ja
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Comment #
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17213
Johan Engelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||industry
--
