https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
greenify changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greeen...@gmail.com
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
Alexandru Razvan Caciulescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
--- Comment #6 from Jon Degenhardt ---
Discussion and proposal with some general agreement in this forum thread:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/nvbn0a$2tlg$1...@digitalmars.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
Jon Degenhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
Michael Rynn y0uf00...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y0uf00...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
--- Comment #3 from ZY Zhou rin...@gmail.com 2009-11-30 21:24:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
No, this is because, on the second run, the program has already reserved a
bunch of memory from the OS, so the GC doesn't run as often.
try
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
ZY Zhou rin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rin...@gmail.com
---