[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2015-06-08 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.022 |D2 --

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2011-06-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2010-11-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #12 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-18 12:15:53 PST --- Seems to be a regression, since according to bug 2056, this code didn't compile in dmd 2.013. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2010-07-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 & D2 |2.022 --- Comment #11 from Leandro

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2010-04-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Linux |All --- Comment #10 from Stewart Gord

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2010-04-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #9 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-04-14 10:36:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Although it is technically a subset of bug 2095 To be precise, it's theoretically a subset of 2095, but technically they are different :) -- Configu

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2010-03-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-03-16 20:19:39 PDT --- It appears that the offending code still compiles in dmd 2.041. I can't remember why I thought the given changeset should fix the problem, maybe it was fixed and then regres

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-12-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer 2009-12-17 05:31:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Does this change cover all cases discussed in the thread linked to in comment > 2? >From looking at the code changes, it does not fix casts fro

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-12-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #6 from Stewart Gordon 2009-12-17 05:19:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm going to reopen this. Although it is technically a subset of bug 2095, it > is not a duplicate. It is possible to fix this bug without fixing 2095.

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-12-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-12-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-02-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 ma...@pochta.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #2 fr

[Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety

2009-01-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 --- Comment #1 from la...@virginia.edu 2009-01-01 20:31 --- I included an unnecessary level of indirection before. A simpler example: const(int)[] answers = [42]; // create const data int[][] unconsted = [[]]; //