[Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3192 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.046 |D1 --

[Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3192 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3192 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2

[Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3192 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3192 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-07-20 02:38:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) For inferring function return type, the nextOf() is null. It'd be great if you could put that in a comment in the definition of nextOf().

Re: [Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate

I'll put some comments in.