[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2014-04-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.046 |D1 --

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2011-04-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2011-01-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2011-01-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2010-04-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 --- Comment #5 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-04-01 05:58:19 PDT --- It's strange... With my patch, my executable has a size of 16 MB, with a .debug_line section size of ca. 500 KB. Without my patch, it's 32 MB, of which .debug_line takes up 16 MB.

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2009-11-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||3540 --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

2009-07-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 --- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2009-07-29 21:19:56 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=435) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=435) dmd patch to fix the problem (against dmd 1.046) I think I found out why it doesn't