[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2018-07-12 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 Timoses changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timos...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Timoses

[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2018-06-18 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||safe CC|

[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2018-06-18 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 FeepingCreature changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2015-06-08 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.036 |D2 --

[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2009-12-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3567] std.traits: Unqual doesn't handle arrays well

2009-12-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3567 --- Comment #2 from Luther Tychonievich la...@virginia.edu 2009-12-02 12:46:35 PST --- Then I propose this design decision ought to be made explicit in the documentation; removes all qualifiers seemed, to me, to imply removing *all*