https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.040 |D2
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #36 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-22 15:16:12 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #34 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-21 10:47:49 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #33 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-20 12:06:10 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #31 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-19 02:35:38
PDT ---
There's a corresponding pull request for dmd that hasn't been merged yet
because Phobos still generates warnings (assumeSafeAppend).
I don't understand why I
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #27 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-18 06:40:27
PDT ---
It's not a good idea to Inhibit more DMD warnings introducing spurious
variables that could generate new variable not used warnings:
If you're interested I
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #28 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-18 06:53:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
If you're interested I could try looking into adding support in DMD for
emitting such warnings.
This is an entirely new topic, so it must be
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #29 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-18 20:03:41 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #30 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-18 20:47:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #26 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-13 02:58:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #25 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-12 22:14:09 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #22 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-09 12:10:49 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #23 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-09 12:47:48 PDT ---
Perhaps I am missing something, but I am not seeing a warning with this code:
int foo(int x) pure nothrow {
return x - 1;
}
void main() {
foo(5);
}
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #24 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-09 12:50:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Perhaps I am missing something, but I am not seeing a warning with this code:
int foo(int x) pure nothrow {
return x - 1;
}
void
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #10 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2014-03-01
00:34:08 PST ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3342
--
Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #11 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-01 14:43:50
PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3342
This pull request adds warnings for unused non-void returns of calls to
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-01 15:20:21 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
This pull request adds warnings for unused non-void returns of calls to
strictly pure function calls.
Is adding a cast(void) before the
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-01 15:43:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
It still think it would be useful to also show the context of the called
function. What do you think?
What's the context of the called
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #15 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-01 15:47:07
PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
It still think it would be useful to also show the context of the called
function. What do you
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-01 16:16:25 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Here's my proposal:
t.d(30,17): Warning: Call to strictly pure function f() discards return value,
prepend a cast(void) if intentional
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #17 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-01 16:25:25
PST ---
In general if a programmer is using an IDE it's easy to click on the function
name at the call point, and jump to the function definition. So the second
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-01 16:35:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I don't think there are any IDEs that support semantic resolution of
overloaded
and/or templated functions especially not when they are
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #19 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-01 16:53:11
PST ---
My suggestion is to search for the cannot call impure function string in the
compiler source code and copy how it's done there.
Do you mean toPrettyChars()?
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #20 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-01 16:59:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
What does test.f!int.f mean?
...
@safe pure nothrow T f(T)(T x)
{
return x*x;
}
void main(string args[])
{
int x = 3;
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #21 from Per Nordl�w per.nord...@gmail.com 2014-03-01 17:01:58
PST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
What does test.f!int.f mean?
...
@safe pure nothrow T f(T)(T x)
{
return x*x;
}
void
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||per.nord...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |LATER
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #7 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-06-25 23:14:11 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I added this as a warning because it's fairly onerous now that we have
implicit
purity deduction.
Thank you very much Walter. DMD 2.054 is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-27 07:29:53 PDT ---
If the druntime function to allocate a new array is a pure function, then this
enhancement request catches a bug like this too:
{
new int[10];
}
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-27 08:39:01 PDT ---
KennyTM~ reminds that this is error message is only for strongly pure
functions.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-27 13:21:22 PDT ---
Walter seems to appreciate the idea:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=132932
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-28 04:21:28 PST ---
See also bug 5464 , that contains and expands just the second part of this
enhancement request (because putting two different requests in a bugzilla issue
is bad).
--
39 matches
Mail list logo
