http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-05-24
14:44:26 PDT ---
I think the better solution is to change it to const(char)[]. This better
reflects that the data may be changing between iterations. If you are not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-05-24
15:28:28 PDT ---
I completely misunderstood the problem here, I thought the string was being
directly returned in the opApply delegate, not a Key object.
Yes, I agree,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-05-24
16:53:41 PDT ---
Yeah from a quick glance at the registry module it does seem a little fishy
overall. __gshared variables, ASCII-only WinAPI calls (what if the registry
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-05-24
17:08:24 PDT ---
I think this was a D1 module casted to D2 to get it to compile :) Probably
would be better served reimplemented, but obviously someone would have to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
