[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #23 from Artem Borisovskiy --- And yes, I was able to compile the code with -dip1000 --

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Artem Borisovskiy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 ag0aep6g changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrjn...@gmail.com --- Comment #21 from ag0aep6g

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #20 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/be4ad4b744f1649f6b010b13a5cbf96582786c46 fix Issue 5212 - no escape analysis for typesafe variadic

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||safe CC|

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #17 from Martin Nowak --- (In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #16) > We should probably enforce (or automatically) add scope to typesafe variadic > arguments. I guess enforcing an explicit scope annotation would make the

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #16 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu --- We should probably enforce (or automatically) add scope to typesafe variadic arguments. --

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #13 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-12-01 10:03:31 PST --- I don't think that implicit .dup is the way to go here. Typesafe variadic functions are about efficiently passing multiple arguments. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-12-01 10:35:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) I don't think that implicit .dup is the way to go here. Typesafe variadic functions are about efficiently passing multiple arguments.

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #15 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-12-01 11:20:47 PST --- Yes, they should be made scope. The specs already say something similar. An implementation may construct the object or array instance on the stack. Therefore, it is

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 --- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-04-19 16:00:33 PDT --- This topic was discussed again in D.learn: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/whlxkcbvkldtmfezu...@forum.dlang.org An improvement of my idea is that when you use scope:

[Issue 5212] no escape analysis for typesafe variadic function arguments

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu