http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5274
--- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-11-29
07:43:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Maybe you are right, there is no much better error message to be invented
here.
Hm... I'd expect a message like:
Error:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5274
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-29 14:25:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Maybe you are right, there is no much better error message to be invented
here.
Hm... I'd expect a message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5274
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5274
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-24 19:34:49 PST ---
I have not expressed myself well enough, I am sorry. This bug report is a
diagnostic one, it's not a rejects valid. So I agree that this code needs
to be refused at compile
