http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
--- Comment #8 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-02-21 08:16:16 PST ---
Well, as of 2.052 replace() has moved to std.array and can't be called at
compile-time anymore at all cause of Appender using pointers.
I've opened a new report:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandf...@jhu.edu
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
--- Comment #5 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2011-02-03 15:00:16 PST ---
This is the patch from Issue 5406. It appear to solve both issue's test cases.
template binaryFunImpl(alias fun, string parm1Name, string parm2Name) {
static if
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
--- Comment #3 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-01-19 12:42:42 PST ---
Yeah it was introduced with 2.051.
The release date in the changelog is wrong.
2.051 probably contains dmd r810 and the bug was introduced in r809.
--
Configure
