[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #10 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-01-27 21:12:58 PST --- Yeah, invalid attributes should not be ignored. They should always generate a compile-time error. Just as expressions with no side-effects generate an error when they

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-01-27 21:24:48 PST --- There are arguments for it which relate to generic programming. It's not that hard to end up with templated code that would have issues compiling if the

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #4 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-01-26 12:35:32 PST --- So the right syntax is: class A { static { ... static this() { ... } ... } } ? Or alternatively class A { static { ... } static

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-26 17:19:02 PST --- I don't think there's anything wrong with the current setup. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #7 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2012-01-26 17:44:20 PST --- There's nothing technically wrong with it, but it's misleading. When you write: class A { int x; this(int) { ... } static { int y; this(uint) {

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 --- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-26 18:07:08 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) There's nothing technically wrong with it, but it's misleading. I think here there's material for a diagnostic enhancement request. (In reply to

[Issue 5868] static attribute ignored with public static {} blocks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5868 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---