[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2019-09-20 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Lorenzo Cogotti changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2018-10-11 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2013-03-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2012-04-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-10-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pelle.mans...@gmail.com

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-10-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-10-23 22:29:00 PDT --- Reopened pull request. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/349 Points: 1. alias this lookup should be considered first. It is the synonym of

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-08-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-08-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-08-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 --- Comment #3 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2011-08-16 03:07:32 PDT --- On the other hand, opDispatch considered first gives much more flexibility. Then, what to do with regular inheritance: class A { int foo(); } class B : A

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-08-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 --- Comment #4 from Gor Gyolchanyan g...@boloneum.com 2011-08-16 03:55:33 PDT --- I agree. This would make more sense. Let the opDispatch be used after alias this. (In reply to comment #2) I am not sure. opDispatch is meant to be a fallback

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

2011-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid