[Issue 7456] Purity strength not documented

2019-12-21 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7456 berni44 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7456] Purity strength not documented

2014-01-15 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7456] Purity strength not documented

2014-01-14 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2014-01-14 06:56:48 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) There is some debate as to whether they even should be. pure is defined quite correctly in the spec. weak vs

[Issue 7456] Purity strength not documented

2014-01-11 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456 Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7456] Purity strength not documented

2012-02-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|