https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luka8...@owave.net
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #7 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
--- Comment #6 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-05-20 12:06:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I agree with your design.
Actually, I think is(typeof(foo)) should be consistent with whether or not foo
compiles.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-02-19 15:25:42 PST ---
I think typeof(overloadset):=void is not good.
Because, in this case, calculating typeof(foo) to void is valid by translating
foo to foo() first.
So introducing new
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7549
--- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-19 15:33:25 PST ---
I agree with your design.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
10 matches
Mail list logo