[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-11-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-11-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 --- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-11-06 08:41:27 PST --- Reduced test case: class Trie { Trie[dchar] children; } int bug7900() { Trie t = new Trie; t.children['='] = new Trie; foreach(v; t.children) if

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-08-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 --- Comment #5 from brian-sch...@cox.net 2012-08-02 14:09:17 PDT --- 2.60 error: dmd: expression.c:1276: void expToCBuffer(OutBuffer*, HdrGenState*, Expression*, PREC): Assertion `precedence[e-op] != PREC_zero' failed. Aborted -- Configure

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 --- Comment #4 from brian-sch...@cox.net 2012-05-04 18:37:02 PDT --- Using DMD from git (b488853f4d3617945851d5d0a2ac20ccb7dab631), the error message now shows: tmp.d(21): Error: CTFE internal error: illegal value TOK232.children dmd:

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-04-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 SomeDude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-04-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 7900] CTFE Internal error with -inline and associative arrays

2012-04-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7900 brian-sch...@cox.net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||CTFE, ice --- Comment #1 from