[Issue 8328] Wrong constness of autogenerated opEquals when fields' opEquals have mixed constness

2014-09-14 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8

[Issue 8328] Wrong constness of autogenerated opEquals when fields' opEquals have mixed constness

2013-11-26 Thread d-bugmail
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8328] Wrong constness of autogenerated opEquals when fields' opEquals have mixed constness

2012-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Issue 8328] Wrong constness of autogenerated opEquals when fields' opEquals have mixed constness

2012-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-06-30 18:16:47 PDT --- Still happens in DMD head (7307e7190d9). The submitter's issue could also be resolved by making Variant const-correct. I don't know what that would

[Issue 8328] Wrong constness of autogenerated opEquals when fields' opEquals have mixed constness

2012-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 --- Comment #6 from Isak Andersson icepa...@gmail.com 2012-06-30 18:21:14 PDT --- Huge thanks to Vladimir for figuring this out! This means I'll be able to go to sleep without worrying about being concerned about solving this. I hope this can