http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8665
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8665
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-09-16 16:24:17
PDT ---
If the decision is that we want different behavior than the spec dictates, then
the spec needs to be changed, but as it stands, according to the spec, this
code is supposed to be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8665
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2012
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8665
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-09-15 21:11:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> According to the spec, this code shouldn't compile in the first place, since
> there are multiple types being returned. To quote the spec:
>
> > If there are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8665
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1