[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2016-01-17 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 Jack Stouffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2015-06-08 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --

[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2013-03-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 --- Comment #6 from jfanati...@gmx.at 2013-03-16 05:34:52 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Also new implementation doesn't handle threading issue 9606. Thanks for pointing this out, I will fix it. Probably

[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2013-02-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 --- Comment #2 from jfanati...@gmx.at 2013-02-28 05:43:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) The current std.signals implementation has various short comings. For closure related shortcomings see Issue 9603. I also

[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2013-02-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 --- Comment #3 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2013-02-28 18:11:02 MSK --- (In reply to comment #2) The new implementation supports wrapping delegates, this is fact was a very important feature for me. But it doesn't do

[Issue 9347] new std.signals2 implementation

2013-02-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|