[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev --- FWIW, after https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6176 (2.073.0) the generated assembly code changed, however a simple benchmark shows that performance did not noticeably

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 D2 |D2 --

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #2

[Issue 9991] Optimizer Doesn't Enregister Static Array Elements With Compile-Time Constant Index

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9991 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-04-25 13:44:14 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) ints definitely fit into registers. sums is one variable, not 4. -- Configure issuemail: