[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3699] Feature Request: while-else

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3699 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #4 from Michel Nolard michel.nol...@gmail.com 2010-01-15 03:13:06 PST --- Ok. I clearly see your point now, and it is both practical and logical ... and I agree ! This would be quite an improvement for a lot of situations. What

[Issue 3403] compiler dies with -X option

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3403 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2601] Extraneous cast introduced in member access

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2601 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |rejects-valid

[Issue 1931] dmd doesn't enforce users to use assert(0) for noreturn func

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1931 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2278] Guarantee alignment of stack-allocated variables on x86

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl

[Issue 1847] Structs aren't aligned on stack

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1847 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2630] ddoc should be able to document unittests

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2630 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.038

[Issue 1396] lazy void tuple breaks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1396 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1652] problem with /// generating strange output

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1652 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1117] ddoc generates corrupted docs if code examples contain attributes with colons

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de ---

[Issue 1914] Array initialisation from const array yeilds memory trample

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1914 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 2127] inliner turns struct return *this from by-value into by-ref

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2127 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #5 from ibrahim YANIKLAR yanik...@gmail.com 2010-01-15 08:43:21 PST --- What bothers me is this : To remove static opCall's completely is another subject... I will explain that by opening a new issue. A case which needs

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #6 from ibrahim YANIKLAR yanik...@gmail.com 2010-01-15 09:57:39 PST --- Also this(int a = 0) and static ... opCall(int a = 0) should be prohibited. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 3709] New: Associative array of associative arrays gets confused

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 Summary: Associative array of associative arrays gets confused Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-15 11:45:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) Also this(int a = 0) and static ... opCall(int a = 0) should be prohibited. That's bug 3438. I think the underlying issue is, that we need

[Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 2451] Cannot add a Variant to associative array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2010-01-15 13:16:14 PST --- Perfect timing, thanks. I just ran into that but had no time to investigate. The type Tuple!(uint, count, float, distance)[uint] does not work, but the

[Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 856] foreach doesn't work when accessing elements as supertypes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=856 Alexey Ivanov aifg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3710] New: Typo in allMembers description?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3710 Summary: Typo in allMembers description? Product: D Version: 2.038 Platform: All URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/traits.html#TraitsExpress ion OS/Version: All

[Issue 3711] New: Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3711 Summary: Ddoc does not generate nothing if std.stdio is imported Product: D Version: 2.038 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal