http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #572 is|0 |1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-02-26
00:35:59 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=574)
Patch file for next attempt at fixing problem (instead of the full file).
Here's a patch if you'd prefer that to the fully
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2351
--- Comment #4 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2010-02-26 05:29:58 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
So the meaning of that code changes from declaring an enum type with no
members
to declaring a manifest constant with value 0.
That
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3716
--- Comment #3 from Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu 2010-02-26
08:15:39 PST ---
Oop. Never mind. I was looking at bug 3854 and assumed they were the same. They
aren't.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3856
Summary: const arguments/instance attributes in
conditions/invariants
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3857
Summary: Write property for arrays does not work properly
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3858
Summary: mixin protection attribute is ignored
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
