[Issue 3910] New: Explicit template instantiations for functions used as array properties?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3910 Summary: Explicit template instantiations for functions used as array properties? Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW

[Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3901 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-09 01:57:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Thank you for all such big work. New features: ... * ref return values now work in CTFE (D2 only). So is this fixing bug 2411 too?

[Issue 3792] Regression: non-constant expression for a template inside a struct using a struct initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3792 Fawzi Mohamed fa...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 1807] ENHANCEMENT: Let IFTI see through templates to simple aliases

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1807 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3904] Infer function type from an alias in a template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3904 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3912] New: pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3912 Summary: pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure Product: D Version: 2.040 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 3911] New: Associative array in CTFE crashes compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3911 Summary: Associative array in CTFE crashes compiler Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3835 --- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-09 04:32:40 PST --- I created bug 3912 for the third bug mentioned in the comments, which has nothing to do with CTFE. Maybe this bug can now be marked as a duplicate of bug 2411? --

[Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3835 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-03-09 04:45:06 PST --- You can mark this as duplicate. But when an improvement is created, it's necessary to try it with *all* duplicated examples too, because you must be sure they are really

[Issue 3914] New: Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3914 Summary: Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 3915] New: typeid not getting type of offsetof standard property

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3915 Summary: typeid not getting type of offsetof standard property Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Issue 3916] New: opEquals for objects does not respect const

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3916 Summary: opEquals for objects does not respect const Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3901 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3917] New: opEquals for Ojbect could be more efficient

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3917 Summary: opEquals for Ojbect could be more efficient Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 3581] private attribute breaks override

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581 Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3918] New: Parameter use before its use in an AndAnd expression with reals treats NaN as false

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3918 Summary: Parameter use before its use in an AndAnd expression with reals treats NaN as false Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status:

[Issue 3667] Regression(D2 only): broken out(result) in contracts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3919] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 9944 in file 'expression.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3919 Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 9944 in file 'expression.c' Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 3920] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c' Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 3342] TLS on dynamically loaded DLLs fails on Windows earlier than Vista

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3342 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-03-09 23:11:09 PST --- I've been looking at the patch, it's an impressive piece of work! But I'd like it to detect the Windows version, and not do anything if it is Vista or