[Issue 4652] Compiler hangs on overloading variadic template + default argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4652 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Issue 942] a delegate defaults to 8 byte alignment when 4 byte is sufficient

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-08-16 00:03:50 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Answer to comment 3: It's true that WONTFIX from Walter are quite uncommon. But here no enough explanations are given to why this change would

[Issue 4647] TDPL: Cannot explicitly call final interface method, ambiguous calls allowed

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4653] New: More unit test functions should be added - like assertEqual() and assertNotEqual()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4653 Summary: More unit test functions should be added - like assertEqual() and assertNotEqual() Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 4653] More unit test functions should be added - like assertEqual() and assertNotEqual()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4653 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-08-16 02:09:45 PDT --- Hmm. I forgot the in on the expected parameter. Oh well, it should be added. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 4652] Compiler hangs on template with zero-length tuple and another argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4652 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D2 |D1 D2 --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 3893] opOpAssign and opIndexOpAssign get wrong operator string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3893 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 942] a delegate defaults to 8 byte alignment when 4 byte is sufficient

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-16 04:51:09 PDT --- Don: But reopening a WONTFIX bug just because you don't like the answer is inappropriate. Frankly, I think it was exceedingly rude. I have just added a comment. I have not

[Issue 4644] assertExceptionThrown to assert that a particular exception was thrown

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4644 --- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2010-08-16 06:55:46 PDT --- Nice work! Btw, don't templates already have __FILE__ and __LINE__ ? See here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/template.html Under Template Value

[Issue 4653] More unit test functions should be added - like assertEqual() and assertNotEqual()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4653 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3979] Order-of-compilation and forward reference errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-08-16 08:15:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Has anyone tried Rainer's patch in bug 190 to see if it fixes this? Yes, I did and it works for the reduced test case, too. Can't

[Issue 4654] New: Cannot overload range iteration against opApply iteration

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4654 Summary: Cannot overload range iteration against opApply iteration Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 4622] Module constructor is not called under some circumstances

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4622 Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4644] assertExceptionThrown to assert that a particular exception was thrown

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4644 --- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2010-08-16 13:04:56 PDT --- Good news, I've found a way to pass __LINE__ and __FILE__. It's a tad bit ugly and uses a struct, I haven't been able to call a struct's custom

[Issue 4656] New: stdio.readf does not ignore white space

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4656 Summary: stdio.readf does not ignore white space Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3361] code in std.zlib concatenates void[] arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3361 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4345] std.range.take!string: Nonsensical finite range with slicing but no length

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4345 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 4464] std.range.take does not always return Take!R

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4464 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4657] New: [std.conv] to!int(7) is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4657 Summary: [std.conv] to!int(7) is broken Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: critical

[Issue 4408] Ambiguity when using std.algorithm.splitter with generic ranges

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4408 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 3877] std.range.chain do not manage infinite ranges correctly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3877 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4114] Support static arrays in some algorithms

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4114 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 2951] std.random.dice() should be templated on proportions.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2951 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4658] New: Support needed for new x86 and x86_64 instructions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4658 Summary: Support needed for new x86 and x86_64 instructions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2