[Issue 6289] Make slices of const/immutable arrays mutable (but keep the elements const/immutable)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6289 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 16:41:31 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/236 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5830] Bug in alias resolution for template value parameters in is()?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5830 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 18:31:22 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 2355 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2355] is() doesn't resolve aliases before template matching
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2355 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@klickverbot.at --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 18:31:22 EST --- *** Issue 5830 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6293] New: [Regression 2.054] 'pure' does not work with member of array of aggregrate
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6293
Summary: [Regression 2.054] 'pure' does not work with member of
array of aggregrate
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 01:38:45 PDT ---
Test case
---
class C6293 {
int token;
}
struct S6293 {
const(C6293)[] tokens;
void f() const pure {
const(C6293) a = tokens[0];
int b = a.token; // -- separating it is ok.
int c = tokens[0].token; // -- cannot access mutable data 'token'
}
}
---
x.d(9): Error: pure nested function 'f' cannot access mutable data 'token'
---
If that 'b' can be accessed in a 'pure' function, there's no reason 'c' cannot.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2355] is() doesn't resolve aliases before template matching
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2355 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |patch, rejects-valid CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|x86 |All Version|2.019 |D2 OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 18:41:18 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/238 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4953] Regression(2.031): templates don't do implicit conversion properly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4953 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|Other |All OS/Version|Linux |All --- Comment #5 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 20:18:23 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/239 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] SortedRange regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
Platform|Other |All
OS/Version|Windows |All
--- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 20:36:47 EST ---
Reduced:
struct X(alias a) { void fx() { a = 4; } int a; }
alias X!a x;
void y(alias b)() { X!b g; }
void main()
{
y!(a)();
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] Regression(2.052): Different template alias parameters to the same literal result in different template instances
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Summary|SortedRange regression |Regression(2.052): ||Different template alias ||parameters to the same ||literal result in different ||template instances --- Comment #5 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 21:25:54 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/240 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5134] std.algorithm.startsWith won't accept var from in as first arg
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5134 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Component|DMD |Phobos --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 22:17:02 EST --- This is not a regression in dmd, but the result of fixing a dmd accepts-invalid. I'll leave it up to the phobos developers to decide if this is a regression or not. There are other similar bugs in bugzilla, and also enhancement requests for dmd that may make this valid code again. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5373] Regression (2.051) CTFE and std.string.replace() causes Bad binary function q{a == b}..
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #9 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-07-12 05:21:13 PDT --- I think we can close this one now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6259] Regression(2.054 beta): Property getters returning ref const() cause setters to be hidden
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Platform|Other |All Version|unspecified |D2 Summary|Property getters returning |Regression(2.054 beta): |ref const() cause setters |Property getters returning |to be hidden|ref const() cause setters ||to be hidden OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 22:56:19 EST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/241 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Component|DMD |Phobos Platform|Other |All AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|and...@metalanguage.com OS/Version|Windows |All --- Comment #6 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 23:00:10 EST --- Maybe this is intentional and therefore not a bug? It doesn't make any sense for private structs to be able to be default constructed, but this is a useful thing to do with the result of map. Andrei? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3332] Mixin a constructor with a construct already present fails
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3332 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de Platform|x86 |All Version|1.047 |D1 D2 OS/Version|Mac OS X|All --- Comment #2 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-07-12 06:13:14 PDT --- Also fails on 2.054, Linux x64 test.d(21): Error: constructor test.A.this () is not callable using argument types (int) test.d(21): Error: expected 0 arguments, not 1 for non-variadic function type A() -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5939] Cannot copy std.algorithm.map
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939 --- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-07-12 08:39:19 PDT --- This is one of those things that could go either way. I see merit in restricting the result of map for direct consumption, without allowing creating an empty result without a corresponding map call. On the other hand, it's often impossible to do so. Consider the many filtering functions that take a range and build additional functionality on top of it. Such functions need to create a range that contains the subject range as a member. It's reasonable to require that map can be combined with such functions. I think it's best to fix this - e.g. by storing a null frame pointer in the default-constructed object. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] New: DMD 2.054 segfaults
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
Summary: DMD 2.054 segfaults
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: pun...@coverify.org
--- Comment #0 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org 2011-07-12 09:47:22 PDT
---
Here is a reduced test case. Compiles and runs fine with dmd-2.053, segfaults
at compile stage for dmd 1.054. Compiles and runs fine with dmd-2.054 if I take
out size_t N template parameter. Also compiles fine with 2.054 if printFoo is
defined outside the main function.
import std.stdio;
struct Foo(IF, size_t N) {}
interface Bar {}
void main() {
void printFoo(T: Foo!(IF, N), IF, size_t N)(T foo)
if(is(IF == interface)) {
writeln(Type: , T.stringof);
}
Foo!(Bar, 1) foo;
printFoo(foo);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] DMD 2.054 segfaults
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295 Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6296] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1121 in file 'glue.c' Product: D Version: D1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com 2011-07-12 10:03:46 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1006) Bug testcase Broken is(typeof(...)) is a realy blocker for me. I didn't know where was a problem since dmd 1.067 where it was introduced. And this bug report is the merit of DustMite: 702 КБ of my D sources - few hours with DustMite (looks like it finally crashed) - 63.2 КБ - some time with DustMite - 2.33 КБ - some time by hands - 96 bytes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] DMD 2.054 segfaults
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-12 10:04:10 PDT ---
Simplified code:
struct Foo(int N) {}
void main() {
void bar(T: Foo!(N), int N)(T) {}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] [Regression 2.054] Segfault in checkPurity() of template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch CC||kenn...@gmail.com Summary|DMD 2.054 segfaults |[Regression 2.054] Segfault ||in checkPurity() of ||template value parameter Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 10:48:23 PDT --- DMD pull #242. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/242 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5134] std.algorithm.startsWith won't accept var from in as first arg
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5134
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-07-12 11:25:38
PDT ---
Of course startsWith won't accept something which was an in parameter. That
would make it const. And a const range is useless. startsWith could work for
const arrays if templates were smart enough to realize that (see bug# 6148),
but they're not. They instantiate with the exact type that you give them, and a
const array can't have popFront called on it, so it's useless in a range-based
function.
Now, if the fix for bug# 6289 gets pulled in, then it'll be possible to use
const arrays with range-based functions by slicing them
void foo(in string str)
{
startsWith(str[], a);
}
but as long as a slice of an array is the exact same type as the original
instead of making the slice mutable (leaving the elements at the appropriate
level of mutability of coures - immutable in the case of string), that doesn't
work. You can cast the string - startsWith(cast(string)str, a) - and it
should work just fine, but as long str is const, it won't. So, this is not a
bug that's going to be fixed by changing anything with startsWith. It's an
inherent limitation in the language with regards to templates. Improving the
situation with slicing const/immutable arrays should help, because then you can
just slice them (as you would have to do with a static array), but until then,
a cast is your best option.
Of course, I would point out that having a string be in is of debatable value
in the first place, since the original array can't be altered anyway. All it
does is make it so that str can't be reassigned to another string inside of
foo. Granted, you may want that, but in plenty of cases, it really doesn't buy
you much.
So, this bug really isn't a bug. Fixing bug# 6289 would make slicing the string
work, which would effectively fix this issue, and if bug# 6148 were ever
implemented, then that would definitely fix it (though it's questionable
whether that's ever going to happen), but as it stands, startsWith isn't doing
anything wrong. If it worked before, it was a bug in dmd.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6297] New: cast() does not remove const or immutable on arrays and pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6297 Summary: cast() does not remove const or immutable on arrays and pointers Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #0 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-12 11:46:14 PDT --- cast() is supposed to remove all attributes from a type, but in the case of arrays, it does nothing to the tail. I think cast() should remove even the tail. Note that arrays *already* implicitly cast to their tail versions. i.e.: const(T[]) implicitly casts to const(T)[] immutable(T[]) implicitily casts to immutable(T)[] so to have: cast()const(T[]) result in const(T)[] serves no purpose, I need no cast there. The same goes for pointers, and if they are ever implemented, tail-const object references. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6298] New: ref breaks struct immutability
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6298
Summary: ref breaks struct immutability
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-12 11:52:22 PDT ---
With DMD 2.054 this code compiles and runs, but I think this is not good:
struct Foo {
int x;
}
void bar(ref Foo f) {
f.x++;
}
void main() {
immutable Foo f;
bar(f);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6299] New: Auto constructor for heap structs too
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6299
Summary: Auto constructor for heap structs too
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-12 11:55:14 PDT ---
Regarding Removing limitations, I'd like this to compile with no need to
write a constructor:
struct Foo { int x; }
void main() {
auto f = new Foo(1);
}
In DMD 2.054 this gives:
test.d(3): Error: no constructor for Foo
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] [Regression 2.054] Segfault in checkPurity() of template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-07-12 12:11:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) DMD pull #242. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/242 That was fast :-) A limited form of typestate (see bug 4571 ) might help D user code avoid many null reference bugs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6295] [Regression 2.054] Segfault in checkPurity() of template value parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6295 --- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 12:17:33 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) DMD pull #242. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/242 That was fast :-) A limited form of typestate (see bug 4571 ) might help D user code avoid many null reference bugs. Typestates in D cannot help NULL dereferencing bugs in DMD which is written in C++. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6300] New: Returning a cast(immutable) struct erroneously calls a matching constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6300
Summary: Returning a cast(immutable) struct erroneously calls a
matching constructor
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de
--- Comment #0 from S�nke Ludwig lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de 2011-07-12
12:40:53 PDT ---
The following snipped fails to compile. What seems to happen is that the return
statement implicitly calls the constructor which in turn returns a mutable S
which is not implicitly castable to immutable - thus the error.
Happens since DMD 2.054
---
struct S {
int[] c;
this(in S){}
immutable(S) f() const {
S s;
return cast(immutable)s;
// the following works:
//immutable(S) sr = cast(immutable)s;
//return sr;
}
}
---
dbug2.d(6): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression ((immutable
immutable(S) __ctmp3 = 0;
, __ctmp3).this(s)) of type S to immutable(S)
.. leaving the severity as normal, as there is an easy workaround
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6298] ref breaks struct immutability
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6298 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||schvei...@yahoo.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-12 13:05:59 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 5493 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5493] Able to overwrite immutable data by passing through ref function parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5493 --- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-12 13:05:59 PDT --- *** Issue 6298 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6284] [Regression 2.054] 'pure' does not work with 'with' statement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6284 --- Comment #3 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 13:22:25 PDT --- DMD pull #243. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/243 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6293] [Regression 2.054] 'pure' does not work with member of array of aggregrate
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6293 --- Comment #1 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 13:22:49 PDT --- DMD pull #243. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/243 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6301] New: Cannot 'zip'/'retro'/'stride' etc. a range having 'ulong' length.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6301
Summary: Cannot 'zip'/'retro'/'stride' etc. a range having
'ulong' length.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 14:24:57 PDT ---
Test case:
--
import std.range;
void f() {
auto LL = iota(1L, 1000L);
auto z = zip(LL, LL);
auto r = retro(LL);
auto pb = popBackN(LL, 2);
auto s = stride(LL, 2);
auto rd = radial(LL);
}
--
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6301] Cannot 'zip'/'retro'/'stride' etc. a range having 'ulong' length.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6301 --- Comment #1 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-07-12 15:21:17 PDT --- Phobos pull #142. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/142 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6302] New: Function imports in debug blocks crashes compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6302
Summary: Function imports in debug blocks crashes compiler
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-07-12
17:12:17 PDT ---
module dmd_crash;
void main()
{
debug
{
import std.math;
FloatingPointControl fpc;
fpc.enableExceptions(FloatingPointControl.severeExceptions);
}
}
dmd -debug dmd_crash.d
---
dmd.exe - Application Error
---
The instruction at 0x00406be3 referenced memory at 0x0030. The memory
could not be read.
Click on OK to terminate the program
Click on CANCEL to debug the program
---
OK Cancel
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6303] New: Order of float declaration changes NaN throwing behavior
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6303
Summary: Order of float declaration changes NaN throwing
behavior
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-07-12
17:23:32 PDT ---
import std.math;
void main()
{
float foo;
FloatingPointControl fpc;
fpc.enableExceptions(FloatingPointControl.allExceptions);
//~ float foo;
auto x = foo / 0;
}
This won't throw unless you replace the first foo declaration with the second
one. This only happens with NaNs. If you initialize the float and do an invalid
operation then it throws:
import std.math;
void main()
{
float foo = 0.0f; // initialize it first
FloatingPointControl fpc;
fpc.enableExceptions(FloatingPointControl.allExceptions);
auto x = foo / 0; // throws, as it should
}
So this odd behavior only happens with NaNs.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6302] Function imports in debug blocks crashes compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6302
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |critical
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-07-12
17:45:41 PDT ---
Lowering to critical as I can use my own version statements to work around
this:
void main()
{
version (Debug)
{
import std.math;
FloatingPointControl fpc;
fpc.enableExceptions(FloatingPointControl.severeExceptions);
}
}
dmd -version=Debug dmd_crash.d
This will work.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6304] New: DMD does not recognize size_t parameter type while type matching
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6304
Summary: DMD does not recognize size_t parameter type while
type matching
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: pun...@coverify.org
--- Comment #0 from Puneet Goel pun...@coverify.org 2011-07-12 18:21:28 PDT
---
Here is a small test case. I get this error on dmd 2.054/053/052/051.
Error vanishes if I replace size_t with ulong on line 6 (inside the is
expression).
$ dmd struct.d
Error: undefined identifier size_t
struct.d(11): Error: template instance struct.printFoo!(Foo!(Bar,1)) error
instantiating
// struct.d
import std.stdio;
struct Foo(IF, size_t N) {}
interface Bar {}
void printFoo(T)(T foo) {
static if(is(T L: Foo!(IF, N), IF, size_t N)) {
writeln(Type: , T.stringof);
}
}
void main() {
Foo!(Bar, 1) foo;
printFoo(foo);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6304] DMD does not recognize size_t parameter type while type matching
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6304 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-13 11:25:35 EST --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 2355 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2355] is() doesn't resolve aliases before template matching
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2355 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pun...@coverify.org --- Comment #4 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-07-13 11:25:35 EST --- *** Issue 6304 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
