[Issue 6819] BigInt ^^ fails for some big numbers (powers)

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6733] Regression(2.054) ICE(cod2.c) struct literals as template arguments

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Issue 6733] Regression(2.054) ICE(cod2.c) struct literals as template arguments

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com

[Issue 6733] Regression(2.054) ICE(cod2.c) struct literals as template arguments

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-10-21 01:04:13 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I just bisected it down to: commit 4c9661fa9fbd427909a334133dfc7f3869e47c31 Author: Walter Bright wal...@walterbright.com Date: Thu Jun

[Issue 6733] Regression(2.054) ICE(cod2.c) struct literals as template arguments

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733 --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-10-21 01:19:10 PDT --- Actually this is more a pseudo-regresssion, it's just an expansion of an existing bug into a few more cases. Walter's commit has nothing to do with the root cause. The

[Issue 6813] Yet another cannot get frame pointer error

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6813 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-10-21 01:40:51 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/3924e924c4c8d7e025efb37f9753927c5ee167f4

[Issue 6825] Regression(2.055+): Address of templated method incorrectly taken

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6825 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2

[Issue 1641] Template function arg deduction gets confused when used with implicit conversions

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1641 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6733] Regression(2.054) ICE(cod2.c) struct literals as template arguments

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733 --- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-10-21 05:05:58 PDT --- Reduced test case: void bug6733(int a, int b) pure nothrow { } void main() { int z; bug6733(z++, z++); } This is definitely a backend bug. What happens is, that

[Issue 6832] Can't test objects wrapped with alias this

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6832 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 6819] BigInt ^^ fails for some big numbers (powers)

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 --- Comment #3 from Olivier Fabre redhatbugzi...@yopmail.com 2011-10-21 05:29:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I've just built and tried latest git (dmd2+druntime+libphobos2) and both the small test above and my original program that

[Issue 6837] New: alias this + UFCS = fail

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6837 Summary: alias this + UFCS = fail Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6836] map + UFCS = fail

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6836 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 6837] alias this + UFCS = fail

2011-10-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6837 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1