[Issue 8177] Let the _type_ create the object; don't call _d_newclass directly!

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8177 --- Comment #2 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-06-01 00:05:32 PDT --- Oops, another correction, this time more minor: There should be no 'typeid' for opDelete. It should simply say typeof(instance).opDelete(instance). (The goal here is to

[Issue 5679] Type aliasing this from an access function defined in base class confuses the compiler about the type of objects

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5679 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 4920] Member expression tuple allowed for types, disallowed for expressions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4920 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 4364] ICE(class.c) compiling a struct def named 'Object' followed by a class definition

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4364 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 4884] Using template struct parameters in method definition fails with parameter _param_0 is already defined

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4884 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 5082] delegate alias parameters are silently accepted inside structs. limits most of std.algorithm, etc.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5082 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4510] [tdpl] ref with a wrong type specifier is accepted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4510 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 3290] accepts-invalid: non-const by-ref foreach over a const array is accepted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3290 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 5435] Static foreach over tuple ignores type annotation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5435 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, pull

[Issue 8179] New: [ICE] with failed opCall

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8179 Summary: [ICE] with failed opCall Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 8180] New: UFCS writeln doesn't work with Tuples

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 Summary: UFCS writeln doesn't work with Tuples Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 8181] New: String splitting with nonempty delim produces empty result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8181 Summary: String splitting with nonempty delim produces empty result Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8182] New: with a lazy struct parameter, the struct's destructor is called on the generated delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8182 Summary: with a lazy struct parameter, the struct's destructor is called on the generated delegate Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 --- Comment #2 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-06-01 17:50:55 PDT --- Sorry, could you please explain how/why you say that is not a bug? o.O -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-06-01 21:25:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Sorry, could you please explain how/why you say that is not a bug? o.O See the output of my code. In both version(A) and version(B),

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 --- Comment #4 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-06-01 21:40:42 PDT --- Oh lol. What version of DMD are you on? Probably just got fixed lol, since they didn't have the same output when I checked. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-06-01 21:46:31 PDT --- I'm using 2.060head. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 5394] Changing the order of writing pragma(msg, (...).mangleof) changes the result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5394 --- Comment #6 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-06-01 22:18:22 PDT --- That's probably why lol. Thanks for posting. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: