[Issue 3031] scoped static var conflicts while linking

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3031 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch, wrong-code |link-failure

[Issue 8360] New: Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8360 Summary: Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8361] New: [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8361 Summary: [ICE] (eh.c line 316) with struct with dtor in assert Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8360] Destruction of uninitialized temporary struct with assert

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8360 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 12:36:55 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 3309] `Traits` : function parameters name

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3309 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:38:34 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org

[Issue 7965] Invalid outer function scope pointer in some cases

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7965 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5547] Improve assert to give information on values given to it when it fails

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5547 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:46:35 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime

[Issue 4809] Stack trace when throwing exception misses location of the throw statement

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4809 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 13:51:50 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 14:03:31 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #71 from deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com 2012-07-08 14:50:57 PDT --- The error is in the fact that addAll isn't aware of B. You can solve that easily with metaprograming, or by overloading addAll for B. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #72 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-08 14:58:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #70) I must say, I would be entirely opposed to fixing this bug. As far as I can see, the arguments of Timon and deadalnix have been entirely theoretical,

[Issue 8312] Too many error messages with a writeln of fixed size array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-08 15:04:14 PDT --- A related case shown in D.learn (reduced): import std.stdio: writeln; void main() { immutable int[] A = [1]; int[A.length] B; writeln(A); writeln(B); }

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #73 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-08 15:08:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #70) P.S. Besides which, the implementation difficulties mentioned by Walter in comment 58 are really big difficulties, that don't seem worth it for

[Issue 8274] thread_attachThis only works for main thread

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8274 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #74 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-08 15:59:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #72) (In reply to comment #70) // BTW I wanted to use an interface here, but I get // missing body { ... } after in or out // and then if I

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #75 from David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com 2012-07-08 17:05:28 PDT --- I must say, I would be entirely opposed to fixing this bug. As far as I can see, the arguments of Timon and deadalnix have been entirely theoretical,

[Issue 8362] New: safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 Summary: safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8362] safe function 'benchmark' cannot call system function literal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-08 18:07:14 PDT --- Actually, I left some extra cruft in that example. The actual example is import std.traits; struct S{ auto fun() { return 1; } } void main() { auto s1 =

[Issue 1824] Object not const correct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 --- Comment #17 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 19:39:59 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 20:16:53 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8323] std.string.chompPrefix does not handle differing string types properly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8323 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-08 20:20:02 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 6329] Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6329 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 8362] std.traits.isSafe doesn't work with unsafe lamdba functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8362 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-08 22:10:46 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/675 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are