[Issue 7733] [tdpl] opIndexUnary not called with postfix increment/decrement operators

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7733 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 5044] opIndexUnary not working for post++

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5044 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---

[Issue 8400] static array type cannot interpret dynamic array length

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-07-26 01:35:52 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) That code should not compile, in my opinion. The rule is, in any circumstance where a compile-time value is

[Issue 7803] Regression(2.054) scope(success) in nothrow/@safe functions causes compile errors

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7803 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 3449] const and invariant struct members do not behave according to spec

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 --- Comment #17 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-26 06:14:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #16) How would the programmer suppress this warning because it's deliberate? When I wrote that, I was thinking that the developer can

[Issue 8445] New: non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8445 Summary: non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8445] non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8445 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 8446] New: Can't use 'this' pointer in pure member function?

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8446 Summary: Can't use 'this' pointer in pure member function? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8447] New: Self importing is allowed?

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8447 Summary: Self importing is allowed? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 8448] New: Take address of label (at least in inline asm)

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8448 Summary: Take address of label (at least in inline asm) Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 5168] String enums don't work with -g compiler switch

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5168 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8445] non-int enum values cause error when compiled with -g

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8445 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8449] New: Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8449 Summary: Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status:

[Issue 8449] Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8449 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-26 14:52:56 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1126) File with long array literal and takes 40+ minutes to compile It looks like the file was too large by a couple hundred K, so

[Issue 8449] Large array literals take a _very_ long time to compile; they do not scale at all

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8449 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1126|0 |1 is

[Issue 8450] New: measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8450 Summary: measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression

[Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8450 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8450 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-26 20:19:14 PDT --- H. I don't think that untyped lambda functions _can_ be considered @safe. They need an actual type for that to be properly checkable. They're not

[Issue 8450] measureTime doesn't work with unsafe template functions

2012-07-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8450 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-26 21:23:42 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/725 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are