[Issue 8717] New: `private` and `protected` restrict member usage in same module

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8717 Summary: `private` and `protected` restrict member usage in same module Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 8716] `package` restricts members usage in same module if there is no package name

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8716 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8716] `package` restricts members usage in same module if there is no package name

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8716 --- Comment #2 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-09-24 10:08:05 MSD --- Of course, but it's common in D that there is no access restrictions in the same module at all. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8718] New: Template mixin + string mixin name collision

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8718 Summary: Template mixin + string mixin name collision Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6625] Distribute newer Windows API import libraries

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6625 Damian damian...@hotmail.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian...@hotmail.co.uk

[Issue 8713] Allow passing arguments to templates in CTFE

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8713 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 8713] Allow passing arguments to templates in CTFE

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8713 --- Comment #2 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2012-09-24 05:33:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) What you are asking for is this: (a) things wrapped in if (__ctfe) don't get fully semantically checked when the function is compiled.

[Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7021 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 8150] Throwing nothrow struct constructor?

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-09-24 07:47:09 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8708] Documentation for std.process.exec family is inaccurate

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8708 Greg Ward g...@gerg.ca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@gerg.ca --- Comment #1

[Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7021 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-09-24 08:32:45 PDT --- That's a bug: .init for nested structs is garbage. It's the cause of bug 6419, for example. defaultInitLiteral() is wrong. Then I _definitely_ think that

[Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7021 --- Comment #17 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-24 08:47:32 PDT --- (In reply to comment #15) That's a bug: .init for nested structs is garbage. It's the cause of bug 6419, for example. defaultInitLiteral() is wrong. Hmmm? Now

[Issue 7021] Structs with disabled default constructors can be constructed without calling a constructor.

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7021 --- Comment #18 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-24 09:10:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #16) Then I _definitely_ think that S() and S.init should always be the same for structs as long as static opCall has not been declared I

[Issue 8719] New: spawnvp() (POSIX) throws exception in fork()ed child process

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8719 Summary: spawnvp() (POSIX) throws exception in fork()ed child process Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8150] Throwing nothrow struct constructor?

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8633] core.atomic not documented

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8633 kekeni...@yahoo.co.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |regression --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 8720] New: Assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 727 in file 'glue.c'

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8720 Summary: Assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 727 in file 'glue.c' Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8721] New: std.algorithm.remove problem

2012-09-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8721 Summary: std.algorithm.remove problem Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos