[Issue 4424] Copy constructor and templated opAssign cannot coexist

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8747] New: isAssignable!(int, const(int)) is false

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8747 Summary: isAssignable!(int, const(int)) is false Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 8747] isAssignable!(int, const(int)) is false

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8747 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Issue 8748] New: the module name must not be unique in the pack and its subpacks

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8748 Summary: the module name must not be unique in the pack and its subpacks Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 8749] New: Wrong mangling of in parameters

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8749 Summary: Wrong mangling of in parameters Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 8444] Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method and class declaration

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8444] Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method and class declaration

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-03 20:19:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Looking at the DMD code I think my bug report is invalid. Dot looks up in the module scope, but there's no 'test' in the test

[Issue 8733] Normalize -of path on Windows

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8733 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-03 20:33:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) *** Issue 8736 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** Guys is this safe to implement this way?: mars.c: void

[Issue 8017] Shadowing declaration not detected in opApply

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8017 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Shadowing declaration not |Shadowing

[Issue 8750] New: ICE when using any and all as a template condition

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8750 Summary: ICE when using any and all as a template condition Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

[Issue 8750] ICE when using any and all as a template condition

2012-10-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8750 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com 2012-10-03 21:38:47 PDT --- The intention of the above is: all!(x = x in R)(sw). Therefore, the clearer code (still fails) would be: all!(x = any!(x)(R))(sw) -- Configure issuemail: