http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8747
Summary: isAssignable!(int, const(int)) is false
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8747
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8748
Summary: the module name must not be unique in the pack and its
subpacks
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8749
Summary: Wrong mangling of in parameters
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-03
20:19:20 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Looking at the DMD code I think my bug report is invalid. Dot looks up in the
module scope, but there's no 'test' in the test
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8733
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-03
20:33:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
*** Issue 8736 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Guys is this safe to implement this way?:
mars.c:
void
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8017
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Shadowing declaration not |Shadowing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
Summary: ICE when using any and all as a template condition
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com 2012-10-03 21:38:47
PDT ---
The intention of the above is: all!(x = x in R)(sw).
Therefore, the clearer code (still fails) would be: all!(x = any!(x)(R))(sw)
--
Configure issuemail:
11 matches
Mail list logo