[Issue 12190] New: runtime loaded shared library on osx: partially worked in 2.062, fails since 2.063

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12190 Summary: runtime loaded shared library on osx: partially worked in 2.062, fails since 2.063 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW

[Issue 12169] sum(int[]) should return a int

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12169 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-02-18 03:23:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) presumably to avoid overflow (which you are usually so concerned about, what changed?) This after very few seconds of run time prints the

[Issue 12189] out parameters should be allowed to modify immutable values in ctors

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #1

[Issue 12191] New: bad purity propagation for double-nested delegate templates

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12191 Summary: bad purity propagation for double-nested delegate templates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 12192] Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192 --- Comment #3 from tcak dy70swq+kzu...@sharklasers.com 2014-02-18 08:11:31 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1329) Used makefile -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Issue 12192] Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192 --- Comment #4 from tcak dy70swq+kzu...@sharklasers.com 2014-02-18 08:11:55 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1330) Output of make -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 12192] New: Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192 Summary: Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 12192] Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192 --- Comment #1 from tcak dy70swq+kzu...@sharklasers.com 2014-02-18 08:10:35 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1327) Library source code -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 12192] Wrong interface file content generated that crashes compiler

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12192 --- Comment #2 from tcak dy70swq+kzu...@sharklasers.com 2014-02-18 08:11:04 PST --- Created an attachment (id=1328) Generated interface file -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 11363] std.process should offer a way to run a executable with a given working directory

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11363 --- Comment #2 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2014-02-18 08:32:00 PST --- workDirFD = open(toStringz(workDir), O_RDONLY); How this behaves if workDir is not null, but empty? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 12193] New: GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 Summary: GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 11478] shared library on osx: worked in 2.062, fails in 2.063.2, still fails in 2.064

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11478 --- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2014-02-18 09:17:22 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) This still fails. it only works when adding import core.runtime inside 'foo.d' So it crashes if you don't import core.runtime? This might be

[Issue 12182] Add support for non-assignable construction to tuples

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12182 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2014-02-18 12:36:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) I knew this was going to be a problem as soon I saw the pull implementing the change. But some pople insist on destroying

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12188] std.algorithm.nextPermutation requires random access

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12188 --- Comment #1 from Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com 2014-02-18 12:51:15 PST --- BTW, you may already know this, but it's impossible to solve this with the current range primitives. See the discussion here:

[Issue 12188] std.algorithm.nextPermutation requires random access

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12188 --- Comment #2 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2014-02-18 13:14:25 PST --- Hmm this sucks. It didn't occur to me that takeN on a bidirectional range doesn't return a bidirectional range. :-( In retrospect, it makes sense (takeN doesn't know the

[Issue 12196] New: Bad error message for multiple declarations

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12196 Summary: Bad error message for multiple declarations Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: minor

[Issue 12197] New: 'invalid array operation' errror message with valid array operation

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12197 Summary: 'invalid array operation' errror message with valid array operation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 12198] New: Catch some wrong overlapping array operations at compile time

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12198 Summary: Catch some wrong overlapping array operations at compile time Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 11630] shared library segv

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11630 Stanislav Blinov stanislav.bli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12193] GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 12167] GIT HEAD: AAs are broken

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12167 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 --- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-02-18 18:38:54 PST --- This change has been introduced to fix the language design issue discovered by bug 12070 (the diagnostic message is added by issue 12124). In D1 age, historically

[Issue 12193] GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid

[Issue 12194] Constructor prevents static opCall regression?

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12194 --- Comment #9 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2014-02-18 20:02:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) You can make error at the all places that using `static Struct opCall()`, by replacing it to `@disable this();`. Perfect

[Issue 12189] out parameters should be allowed to modify immutable values in ctors

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 12193] GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 12193] GIT HEAD: opOpAssign ignored if this aliases to bool value

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-02-18 20:45:33 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 12189] out parameters should be allowed to modify immutable values in ctors

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12189 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2014-02-19 06:46:46 EET --- Thanks, I didn't think about that. If out did not allow escaping references then I guess it would be different. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 12200] New: Strange crash while debugging in Win64

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200 Summary: Strange crash while debugging in Win64 Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 12200] Strange crash while debugging in Win64

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200 --- Comment #1 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2014-02-18 21:22:19 PST --- Interestingly, the disassembly's very different in the actual context where I'm experiencing this, but it still happens. The disasm: case '[':++depth;

[Issue 12195] Cannot directly instantiate a template produced by eponymous template instantiation

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12195 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1566] Nested template issue

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1566 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samu...@voliacable.com

[Issue 1566] Nested template issue

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1566 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #7

[Issue 12201] New: Crash on bad import within mixed in template

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12201 Summary: Crash on bad import within mixed in template Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: ice Severity: normal

[Issue 12186] Problems with partially inferred type for immutable lambda argument

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12186 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 12200] Strange crash while debugging in Win64

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12200 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|