[Issue 16227] std.numeric unit tests fail when run in isolation

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16227 TJ Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tjfr...@outlook.com --- Comment #1 from TJ Ryan -

[Issue 12558] try/catch allows implicit catching of Errors without specifying any Exception type

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 --- Comment #18 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/458ff506e385c05c8eb9f08b6915267c662780c3 Issue 12558 - Document implicit catch statement d

[Issue 16268] New: Wrong optimization in code with integer overflow

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16268 Issue ID: 16268 Summary: Wrong optimization in code with integer overflow Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major

[Issue 16268] Wrong optimization in code with integer overflow

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16268 ag0ae...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Issue 14251] synchronized (mtx) doesn't check attributes (pure, const)

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 14251] synchronized (mtx) doesn't check attributes (pure, const)

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251 --- Comment #7 from ZombineDev --- The OP issue doesn't mention class monitors. The bug also affects raw sync primitives like core.sync.mutex and in general everything using Object.IMonitor. --

[Issue 14251] synchronized (mtx) doesn't check attributes (pure, const)

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251 Lodovico Giaretta changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lodov...@giaretart.net --- Comment #6 fr

[Issue 16269] New: add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16269 Issue ID: 16269 Summary: add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Statu

[Issue 16269] add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16269 Ketmar Dark changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org --

[Issue 16269] add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16269 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 16269] add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16269 --- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark --- i just thought that `.clear!true` is better. i don't know why: probably 'cause i just love D templates and want to use 'em everywhere. ;-) still, it's a matter of simple renaming, i don't have real API preferences

[Issue 16269] add `aa.clear!true` method to associative array to clear and initialize it

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16269 --- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark --- p.s. i created this ER in the hope that people will talk about API too: i'm usually sux at inventig APIs. --

[Issue 16270] New: scoped Alignment

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16270 Issue ID: 16270 Summary: scoped Alignment Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Compo

[Issue 16271] New: Should be able to express that a lambda returns by reference

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16271 Issue ID: 16271 Summary: Should be able to express that a lambda returns by reference Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Issue 16268] Wrong optimization in code with integer overflow

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16268 Lodovico Giaretta changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lodov...@giaretart.net --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 16272] New: Yield like semantics for function execution

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16272 Issue ID: 16272 Summary: Yield like semantics for function execution Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 16272] Yield like semantics for function execution

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16272 Mathias Lang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mathias.l...@sociomantic.co

[Issue 16273] New: [REG 2.072a] dmd segfault with inheritance, templates, override

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16273 Issue ID: 16273 Summary: [REG 2.072a] dmd segfault with inheritance, templates, override Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 14251] synchronized (mtx) doesn't check attributes (pure, const)

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to ZombineDev from comment #7) > The OP issue doesn't mention class monitors. The bug also affects raw sync > primitives like core.sync.mutex and in general everything using > Object.IMonitor. 'Klass'

[Issue 16272] Yield like semantics for function execution

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16272 --- Comment #2 from teddybear12...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #1) > This is already possible using a library solution, see > https://dlang.org/phobos/std_concurrency.html#.Generator I believe their is a subtle difference. I

[Issue 16251] regex - `(..).*\1` doesn't match "axxxx"

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16251 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev --- (In reply to TJ Ryan from comment #1) > The regex module doesn't appear to > currently support any context sensitive tokens. What makes you say that? --

[Issue 16274] New: The curses of debugging: short argument passed in 16-bit register, against ABI

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16274 Issue ID: 16274 Summary: The curses of debugging: short argument passed in 16-bit register, against ABI Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X

[Issue 16274] The curses of debugging: short argument passed in 16-bit register, against ABI

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16274 Luís Marques changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86 |x86_64 Severity|enhancement

[Issue 16274] The curses of debugging: short argument passed in 16-bit register, against ABI

2016-07-12 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16274 ag0ae...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|