[Issue 2733] Unclear semantics of template value parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2733 s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #1 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-01 04:53 --- Non-alias template arguments are, by definition, compile-time constants. s isn't a compile-time constant - it's a mutable reference to immutable data. So this shouldn't compile. --
[Issue 2733] Unclear semantics of template value parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2733
--- Comment #2 from samu...@voliacable.com 2009-04-01 05:13 ---
I'm not that sure anymore. Actually, I wouldn't mind if they were passed by
alias. Then, I could write simply
template foo(string s)
{}
instead of
template foo(alias s) if (isString!(s))
{}
If I want to restrict template arguments to statically known values, I can use
a isCompileTime constraint
template foo(string s) if (isCompileTime!(s))
{
}
--
[Issue 2515] Lots of pure and nothrow functions not marked as such.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2515 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 06:03 --- I'm marking this as closed, since the examples given (functions in std.math) are pure nothrow from DMD 2.027, in every case which is currently possible. In general, at the present time, marking Phobos functions as 'pure nothrow' is a work-in-progress, not a bug. --
[Issue 2433] Assertion failure: 't-deco' on line 604 in file 'mtype.c'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 06:08 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1994 *** --
[Issue 716] -inline: conditinal compilation of an empty foreach body causes the compiler to segfault
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=716 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Keywords||patch Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 07:19 --- Works for me. The code in DMD 2.027 is exactly as described by David. I guess it was fixed at some point. --
[Issue 2776] New: pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 Summary: pragma(lib, does not work when used in headers Product: D Version: 1.041 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com ReportedBy: ben...@tionex.de I tried to use the pragma(lib, ...) feature without success. I build a lib called org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86.lib, the source contain several pragma declarations: pragma(lib, comctl32.lib); // and more win32 libs pragma(lib, org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86.lib); // link to the lib itself The module with those pragmas is always imported if the lib is used. Now, when i compile a example using the lib and turn on verbose, dmd prints all those lib lines ... library comctl32.lib library org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86.lib ... Later it prints the commands it passes to link.exe, here the libs are missing: c:\Project\dwtinst\tango-0.99.8-bin-win32-dmd.1.041\bin\link.exe C:\Project\dwtinst\dwt-rcp\obj\SwtSnippet10,C:\Project\dwtinst\dwt-rcp\bin\SwtSnippet10.exe,,user32+kernel32/noi+C:\Project\dwtinst\dwt-rcp\lib\+tango-user-dmd.lib; The result are all those symbols are missing. --
[Issue 1928] dmd SEGV with too many template parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1928 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 07:26 --- No longer segfaults in DMD2.027. bug.d(5): Error: template instance bar!(foo,foo) does not match template declara tion bar(alias E) --
[Issue 1916] dmd ice on invalid string concat
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1916 --- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 07:57 --- Only segfaults on D2. fog.d(2): Error: incompatible types for ((1) ~ ( foo?)): 'int' and 'immutable( char)[]' fog.d(2): Error: Can only concatenate arrays, not (int ~ immutable(char)[]) fog.d(2): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (\x01 foo?) of type int to immutable(char)[] [SEGFAULT] --
[Issue 2777] New: alias this doesn't forward __dollar and slice op.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2777
Summary: alias this doesn't forward __dollar and slice op.
Product: D
Version: 2.027
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
import std.stdio;
struct ArrayWrapper(T) {
T[] array;
alias array this;
}
void main() {
ArrayWrapper!(uint) foo;
foo.length = 5; // Works
foo[0] = 1; // Works
writeln(foo[0]); // Works
writeln(foo[$ - 1]); // Error: undefined identifier __dollar
writeln(foo[0..2]); // Error: ArrayWrapper!(uint) cannot be sliced with
[]
}
--
[Issue 867] Error messages refer to _dtor instead of ~this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=867
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 09:47 ---
The 'scope' error has already been fixed for D2, but not for D1.
This simple patch changes __dtor into ~this, by analogy to how it's done for
constructors.
Index: declaration.h
===
--- declaration.h (revision 21)
+++ declaration.h (working copy)
@@ -661,6 +661,8 @@
Dsymbol *syntaxCopy(Dsymbol *);
void semantic(Scope *sc);
void toCBuffer(OutBuffer *buf, HdrGenState *hgs);
+const char *kind();
+char *toChars();
int isVirtual();
int addPreInvariant();
int addPostInvariant();
Index: func.c
===
--- func.c (revision 21)
+++ func.c (working copy)
@@ -2592,6 +2592,16 @@
return FALSE;
}
+const char *DtorDeclaration::kind()
+{
+return destructor;
+}
+
+char *DtorDeclaration::toChars()
+{
+return (char *)~this;
+}
+
int DtorDeclaration::isVirtual()
{
/* This should be FALSE so that dtor's don't get put into the vtbl[],
--
[Issue 2235] false unreachable statement detected, no linenumbers shown (-w only)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2235 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||2463 Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-01 10:31 --- Only applies to DMD1. The missing line number bug is the same as 2463. --
[Issue 920] Auto classes referenced where scope should be used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=920 matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi 2009-04-01 11:52 --- Fixed with DMD 1.042. --
[Issue 2778] New: alias this + IFTI doesn't work.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2778
Summary: alias this + IFTI doesn't work.
Product: D
Version: 2.027
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
DMD 2.027 can't implicitly instantiate templates properly based on implicit
conversions via alias this.
import std.stdio;
struct ArrayWrapper(T) {
T[] data;
alias data this;
}
void doStuffTempl(T)(T[] data) {}
void doStuffFunc(int[] data) {}
void main() {
ArrayWrapper!(int) foo;
doStuffFunc(foo); // Works.
doStuffTempl!(int)(foo); // Works.
// Error: template test.doStuffTempl(T) does not match any function
// template declaration
// Error: template test.doStuffTempl(T) cannot deduce
// template function from argument types !()(ArrayWrapper!(int))
doStuffTempl(foo);
}
--
[Issue 1386] string expected when using allMembers-element in __traits(getMember, ...)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1386 mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de Severity|normal |blocker Version|2.003 |2.027 --
[Issue 920] Auto classes referenced where scope should be used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=920 --- Comment #5 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:46 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2591] custom allocator new argument should be size_t instead of uint
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2591 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:47 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2689] seek behaves incorrectly on MAC OSX
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2689 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:47 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2705] Response file size cannot exceed 64kb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2705 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:47 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2744] wrong init tocbuffer of forstatement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2744 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:49 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2747] improper toCBuffer of funcexp
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2747 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:49 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2750] Optimize slice copy with size known at compile time
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2750 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:49 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2751] incorrect scope storage class vardeclaration tocbuffer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2751 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:50 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2731] Errors in associative array example
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2731 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:48 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2570] Patch for some mistakes in Ddoc comments.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2570 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:46 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2711] -H produces bad headers files if function defintion is templated and have auto return value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2711 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:48 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2745] missing token tochars in lexer.c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2745 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:49 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 1645] can override base class' const method with non-const method
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1645 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:51 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2336] link to nonexistent std_array.html
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2336 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:51 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2767] DMD incorrectly mangles NTFS stream names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2767 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:50 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 and 2.027 --
[Issue 2595] template ctors crash compiler
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2595 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:52 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:52 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2626] template function not working against template struct instantiated with default arguments
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2626 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:53 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:51 --- Fixed DMD 1.042 --
[Issue 2674] Copy postblit constructor this(this) not called for members
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2674 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:53 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2700] typeof tests stops compilation abruptly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2700 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:53 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2722] ICE with variadic template parameters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2722 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:54 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2723] ICE with variadic template parameters, different case
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2723 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:54 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2725] Pattern matching in static if not working with variadic arguments
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2725 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:54 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2724] Persistent segfaults in templated code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2724 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:54 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2574] std.c.stdio doesn't compile: va_list not defined!
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2574 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:52 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2728] Bogus Error message on const ref return
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:55 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2729] hash_t undocumented and unnecessary
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2729 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:55 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2746] Make float.init signalling NaN by default
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2746 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:56 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2752] std.xml does not encode CData correctly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2752 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:56 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2756] Bad code generation for pure nothrow math functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2756 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:57 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2754] The error message regarding implicit conversion to shared doesn't mention shared in the message.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2754 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:57 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2727] std.date Cyclic dependency
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2727 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:55 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2739] _argptr is invalid for functions nested in class methods
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2739 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:56 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2766] DMD hangs with 0%cpu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2766 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:58 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2755] ICE on invalid ref returns in linked objects: Assertion failure: 'type' on line 6566 in file 'expression.c'. No ICE or error if invalid code is local to the file.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2755 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:57 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2761] Unreachable statement warning in std.string
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2761 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:57 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2779] New: alias this + tuple expansion on function call doesn't work
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2779
Summary: alias this + tuple expansion on function call doesn't
work
Product: D
Version: 2.027
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
struct Tuple(T...) {
T data;
alias data this;
}
void doStuff(uint a, float b) {}
void main() {
Tuple!(uint, float) foo;
doStuff(foo[0], foo[1]); // Works.
doStuff(foo.tupleof); // Works.
doStuff(foo.data); // Works.
// Error: function test.doStuff (uint a, float b)
// does not match parameter types (Tuple!(uint,float))
// Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (foo) of type
// Tuple!(uint,float) to uint|
// Error: expected 2 function arguments, not 1
doStuff(foo);
}
--
[Issue 2780] New: ref Return Allows modification of immutable data
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2780
Summary: ref Return Allows modification of immutable data
Product: D
Version: 2.027
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
import std.stdio;
struct Immutable {
immutable uint[2] num;
ref uint opIndex(uint index) immutable {
return num[index];
}
}
void main() {
immutable Immutable foo;
writeln(foo[0]); // Prints 0.
foo[0]++;
writeln(foo[0]); // Prints 1.
}
Probably related to the fix for bug 2728 because the weird error message
provided by 2728 was what used to prevent this bug from happening.
--
[Issue 2319] Win32 Exception not very useful
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2319
to...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||to...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from to...@yahoo.com 2009-04-01 15:03 ---
Still get Error: Win32 Exception with this code:
---
void main()
{
asm { int 3; }
}
---
No big deal for me, I just tried out of curiousity. Thought I'd mention it,
though.
--
[Issue 2625] Creating new struct with literal bypasses immutability of members if struct is in array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Keywords|spec|accepts-invalid
Summary|Inconsistent behavior with |Creating new struct with
|const/immutable struct |literal bypasses
|members |immutability of members if
||struct is in array
--- Comment #1 from dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-04-01 15:06 ---
Upon thinking about this some more, it's pretty clear that one should *not* be
able to change the value in an existing memory location by creating a whole new
struct, i.e. the following is bad:
struct Pair {
immutable uint g1;
uint g2;
}
void main() {
Pair[1] stuff;
stuff[0] = Pair(1, 2); // Modify immutable by rebinding whole struct.
}
Note that the same thing happens if stuff is a dynamic array instead of a
static array. Upping severity, giving more descriptive title.
--
[Issue 1386] string expected when using allMembers-element in __traits(getMember, ...)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1386 dhase...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.027 |2.003 --- Comment #4 from dhase...@gmail.com 2009-04-01 17:44 --- Leave the version number on the _earliest_ dmd version exhibiting the problem. --
[Issue 1386] string expected when using allMembers-element in __traits(getMember, ...)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1386 dhase...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #5 from dhase...@gmail.com 2009-04-01 17:47 --- Also, you can work around this using a for-loop (I think) or recursive templates; and blocker refers to a bug sufficiently severe that Walter should drop everything else and fix this bug, or even possibly roll back to an earlier version that does not exhibit the bug. --
[Issue 1386] string expected when using allMembers-element in __traits(getMember, ...)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1386
--- Comment #6 from mrmoc...@gmx.de 2009-04-01 17:54 ---
Ok, sorry didn't know.
Finally managed to compile a workaround:
template Sequence(size_t count, size_t index = 0)
{
static if (index count)
alias Tuple!(index, Sequence!(count, index + 1)) Sequence;
else
alias Tuple!() Sequence;
}
static const members = __traits (allMembers, foo);
foreach (i; Sequence!(members.length))
{
foreach (p; ParameterTypeTuple!(__traits(getMember, foo,
members[i])))
writefln(typeid(p));
}
--
[Issue 2781] New: alias this doesn't work with foreach
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2781
Summary: alias this doesn't work with foreach
Product: D
Version: 2.027
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
struct Tuple(T...) {
T data;
alias data this;
}
void main() {
Tuple!(uint, float) foo;
foreach(elem; foo) {} // Error: Cannot infer type for elem.
}
The same applies when this is aliased to an array instead of a tuple.
--
[Issue 2782] New: Parameter Names Should Be Visible In Function Template Constraints
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2782
Summary: Parameter Names Should Be Visible In Function Template
Constraints
Product: D
Version: 2.016
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
void doStuff(T)(T arg)
if(is(typeof(arg))) {
}
void main() {
doStuff(1);
}
Results:
test7.d|6|template test7.doStuff(T) if (is(typeof(arg))) does not match any
function template declaration|
test7.d|6|template test7.doStuff(T) if (is(typeof(arg))) cannot deduce
template function from argument types !()(int)
I assume the reason this does not compile is because the symbol arg is not
visible from the template constraint.
--
