http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2884
Summary: ICE: Assert: 'template.c', line 3773, 'global.errors'
Product: D
Version: 1.041
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2883
Summary: array member call syntax fails when array is returned
from "property" syntax
Product: D
Version: 1.041
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1432
--- Comment #1 from to...@famolsen.dk 2009-04-22 21:33 ---
Another variation:
union S
{
float[2] a;
struct
{
union { float i = 1; float x; }
union { float j = 2; float y; }
}
}
$ dmd bar.d -c
bar.d(2)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2878
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2882
Summary: std.random.MersenneTwisterEngine without no seed
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2881
Summary: x.stringof returns typeof(x).stringof when x is an enum
Product: D
Version: 1.041
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severit
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2807
--- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 15:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=335)
--> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=335&action=view)
Patch against 2.029. Includes patch for the related bug 2695, as well
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2807
--- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 15:07 ---
And here's a patch. This makes it safe to have nested pure functions.
A nested pure function is only permitted to access its own variables, plus
immutables and manifest co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2880
Summary: DMD is generating the wrong file & line number for a
(new) phobos error in conv.text. traits.d:1011
conv.d:2454
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2879
Summary: std.bigint missing from phobos
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pho
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1929
--- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 10:04 ---
Works for me D2.029 and 1.042.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #7 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-22 09:53 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> So please, please, please, don't change the specs, fix the implementation.
I entirely agree. Moreover, I proposed a strategy more than 3 years ago. S
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2878
Summary: Forward reference
Product: D
Version: 1.042
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedT
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #6 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 08:35 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > The spec specifies what the code should do, but the code being generated
> > does
> > something else. How is that not th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||spec
--- Comment #5 from c
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2876
--- Comment #1 from fvbom...@wxs.nl 2009-04-22 07:56 ---
*** Bug 2877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2876
fvbom...@wxs.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|suggest keyword:auto return |suggest keyword:auto return
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2877
fvbom...@wxs.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2876
Summary: suggest keyword:auto return
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2877
Summary: suggest keyword:auto return
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #4 from fvbom...@wxs.nl 2009-04-22 07:41 ---
The spec specifies what the code should do, but the code being generated does
something else. How is that not the very definition of wrong-code?
(This probably falls in the "the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #3 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 07:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> "it's not bad code generation" - how do you work that out?
Bad code generation generally means the front-end is sending incorrect data to
the ba
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #2 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-22 06:46 ---
"it's not bad code generation" - how do you work that out?
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
--- Comment #1 from clugd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2339
--- Comment #1 from matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi 2009-04-22 03:51
---
I've been investigating this a bit and the issue seems to be that
VarDeclaration::needThis() returns true for x; if I make it return false
instead, the code co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2695
--- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 03:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=334)
--> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=334&action=view)
Patch for DMD2.029.
This patch also prevents pure functions from cal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2875
Summary: ICE(cgcod.c) setting delegate = &Struct.func
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
Summary: phobos docs issues
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
28 matches
Mail list logo
