[Issue 2948] New: Array literal changeable if part of class.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2948 Summary: Array literal changeable if part of class. Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946 s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com Severity|norma

[Issue 2939] lazy evaluation not invoked for lambda function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939 --- Comment #9 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2009-05-06 16:06 --- (In reply to comment #8) > if (arg->type->ty != Tdelegate) // DO NOT "DELEGATIZE" TWICE Please no! I don't think this is the correct way to fix this as

[Issue 2900] Array appending slowed drastically since integration of druntime

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2900 dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #340 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Issue 2900] Array appending slowed drastically since integration of druntime

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2900 --- Comment #6 from dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-05-06 14:53 --- Sure, but could you please specify what's wrong with it and/or give me hints as to how to fix it? It seems right to me, though I'm pretty new to submitting patches. Also, wh

[Issue 2900] Array appending slowed drastically since integration of druntime

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2900 --- Comment #5 from s...@invisibleduck.org 2009-05-06 13:12 --- I'm afraid the source locations where most of this code is inserted by the patches is wrong. Could you update them? --

[Issue 2947] New: Array literal changeable if part of class.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2947 Summary: Array literal changeable if part of class. Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946 --- Comment #1 from g...@nwawudu.com 2009-05-06 10:17 --- Another example. main.d -- class Foo1 { abstract void foo(); } class Bar1 : Foo1 { } abstract class Foo2 { abstract void foo(); } class Bar2 : Foo2 { } void ma

[Issue 2946] New: Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946 Summary: Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digita

[Issue 2945] Precedence of 'new' vs '.'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2945 --- Comment #3 from schvei...@yahoo.com 2009-05-06 09:05 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Ceraintly. However, new MyClass().Foo; has no such ambiguity until D becomes > capable of returning types from functions. Traditionally, runtime

[Issue 2932] bad e_ehsize (36 != 52)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2932 --- Comment #1 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-05-06 08:47 --- BTW, GNU Gold works great with gdc and ldc, so it looks like it's definitely not a frontend problem. GNU Gold is supposed to replace the old GNU ld linker sooner than later, s

[Issue 2645] dmd 2.023 crashes on this (wrong) code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2945] Precedence of 'new' vs '.'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2945 --- Comment #2 from simen.kja...@gmail.com 2009-05-06 07:53 --- (In reply to comment #1) > There might be a problem here in that in D you can write it without the > brackets: > > new MyClass.Foo; > > Is the above trying to create a

[Issue 1716] Access Violation at readln

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1716 Bug 1716 depends on bug 1706, which changed state. Bug 1706 Summary: Access Violation at readln http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1706 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Issue 2945] Precedence of 'new' vs '.'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2945 matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|PC |All --- Commen

[Issue 1706] Access Violation at readln

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1706 g...@nwawudu.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2942] asm fadd; accepted, but generates code for faddp.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2942 --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-05-06 03:55 --- Created an attachment (id=352) --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=352&action=view) Patch against DMD 2.029 This simple patch comments out the problemat

[Issue 2937] postblit not called for foreach arg over array of structs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2937 g...@nwawudu.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #2 from

[Issue 2941] asm fstsw AX; generates incorrect opcode

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2941 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #1 from