[Issue 3597] Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3597



--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-12-09 
04:24:46 PST ---
From *code*? o.O

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2425] interface mistyped for invariant in spec

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2425


Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jlqu...@optonline.net


--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-12-09 
04:30:08 PST ---
*** Issue 3586 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3586] TypeSpecialization rule has duplicate entry for interface

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3586


Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


--- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-12-09 
04:30:08 PST ---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 2425 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3598] Static functions in immutable structs/classes needed

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3598



--- Comment #1 from Tomasz SowiƄski tomeks...@gmail.com 2009-12-09 11:22:11 
PST ---
I heard the bug is not clear about what should we do, so I'll restate:
Currently everything inside an immutable struct/class is
tagged with  immutable. I say, tag everything but static functions.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3444] foreach(i, elem; range) should work

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3444


David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |


--- Comment #2 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-09 20:37:20 PST ---
Argh, accidentally marked the wrong bug fixed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 3443] Thread.thread_needLock() should be nothrow

2009-12-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3443


David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-09 20:37:56 PST ---
Fixed.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---