[Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3605 --- Comment #1 from Michal Minich michal.min...@gmail.com 2009-12-11 02:59:28 PST --- Correction: in example 2 i = 1; will not cause error, only writeln (i); causes it. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 3605] Compiler accepts invalid variable declaration, which does not link

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3605 --- Comment #4 from Michal Minich michal.min...@gmail.com 2009-12-11 04:15:06 PST --- Thank you for explanation Lars, It did not occurred to me that int i(); can be function declaration. Maybe if such declaration required extern(D) attribute,

[Issue 3606] New: Problems with struct destructors and const structs

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Summary: Problems with struct destructors and const structs Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3606] Problems with struct destructors and const structs

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 --- Comment #2 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-12-11 07:08:40 PST --- Well... compiler's complaints are understandable, you are trying to do meaningless thing. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 3606] Problems with struct destructors and const structs

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 --- Comment #1 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2009-12-11 07:05:10 PST --- Errors in 2.031: Error: destructor tmp.Foo.~this () does not match parameter types () Error: f.~this can only be called on a mutable object, not

[Issue 3608] New: Allow isExpression and templates to capture template parameters and FQN of template

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3608 Summary: Allow isExpression and templates to capture template parameters and FQN of template Product: D Version: future Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 3609] New: isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3609 Summary: isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3609 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3609 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3609] isNumeric causes a stack overlfow with mutable arrays

2009-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3609 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-12-11 21:43:25 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) IMHO it's kind of silly to define isNumeric. It does about the same amount of work as to, but doesn't give you the actual number. I