[Issue 3680] default struct constructor should not be removed
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3680 --- Comment #8 from Michel Nolard michel.nol...@gmail.com 2010-01-19 02:50:53 PST --- * This comment is more a remainder for myself than a new comment. * There is a way to introduce a opAssign( typeof( this ) rhs ) using templates, although it is prohibited. The technique can be _accidentally_ (I ensure you this really happens) used to add a opCall or this with the wrong signature. This is based on the fact that the template's type inference occurs at a different time than the opAssign's signature validation. I just have to find back where I used it to give you an example to be sure that that case also is managed in the proposal. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 605] Problem w/ function overload resultion and enums.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=605 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-19 08:33:11 PST --- This was fixed between 0.175 and 1.000. (The example works in 1.053, but not in 1.054; however, that's an unrelated regression). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3723] New: Regression: forward referenced enum
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3723
Summary: Regression: forward referenced enum
Product: D
Version: 1.054
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #0 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-19 08:44:58 PST ---
This code worked on 1.053, fails to compile on 1.054, and on D2.
I suspect this was caused by the fix to bug 3611.
-
FwdEnum this_fails;
enum :int
{
E1 = 2
}
enum FwdEnum: int
{
E2 = E1
}
-
bug.d(10): Error: undefined identifier E1
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3650 --- Comment #4 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-01-19 12:30:59 PST --- PS: as far as is() is concerned, functions should just work like delegates. Any difference should be considered as bug. Also, if this happens not to be a bug, please mark it as enhancement, and not as invalid (like I said above). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3719] forward references can cause out-of-memory error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3719 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-01-19 18:52:34 PST --- Changeset 342 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3724] New: bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer dereference on struct-union-struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3724
Summary: bug in Expression::arraySyntaxCopy (null pointer
dereference on struct-union-struct
Product: D
Version: 2.039
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl
--- Comment #0 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-01-19
19:14:35 PST ---
In case of code similar to this
struct v {
union {
struct { float a, b; }
struct { float c[2]; }
}
}
(it is more complicated than just this sample, to trigger this bug.
I can't easly produce small example)
file expression.c
method Expression *StructLiteralExp::semantic(Scope *sc)
performs kind of flatening, and adds member c to array elements,
but in case on union memberrs it adds them as null:
relevant lines:
line 3373
if (v-offset offset)
{ e = NULL;
sd-hasUnions = 1;
}
and line 3393
elements-push(e)
Fix:
In file expression.c line 1477
method Expressions *Expression::arraySyntaxCopy(Expressions *exps)
add condition:
for (int i = 0; i a-dim; i++)
{ Expression *e = (Expression *)exps-data[i];
-e = e-syntaxCopy();
+ if (e)
+e = e-syntaxCopy();
a-data[i] = e;^M
}
Without it, optimize.c lines 86-87 will call indirectly this method, when some
(last) elemenets of exps is/are nulls, and segfault.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3725] New: Add united type to standard library
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3725 Summary: Add united type to standard library Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu --- Comment #0 from BCS shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2010-01-19 22:26:28 PST --- After some interest was expressed ( http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=104904 ) for having a type that keeps track of units (e.g. seconds, feet, grams, etc.) I cleaned up my version of this. http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/units/si2.d http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/units/rational.d I'm willing to license it however is needed to get it added to Phobos (and I'll make the same offer for tango). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
