[Issue 3791] Reference anonymous nested classes when describing new expressions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3791 --- Comment #1 from Jerry Quinn 2010-03-11 19:50:00 PST --- A couple of words should be associated with PostfixExpression as well, since that's where nested class new syntax actually shows up in the grammar. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.

[Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #7 from David Simcha 2010-03-11 19:07:16 PST --- Well, there are really two issues here: What happens when GC.free() gets called and what happens when the GC collects. As much as people (Andrei comes to mind) hate it from a theore

[Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GC.free() creates subtle|Interactions between LRU

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-03-11 18:08:26 PST --- The cache actually depends on it. If the block info in the cache is freed and then reallocated as smaller blocks, using append may utilize a stale blockinfo and allow overwr

[Issue 3935] opBinary is instantiated with "="

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3935 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 3935] New: opBinary is instantiated with "="

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3935 Summary: opBinary is instantiated with "=" Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #4 from David Simcha 2010-03-11 16:41:52 PST --- What about the issue of unnecessary GC retention of (possibly large) arrays? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 3921] Compile time evaluation requirements not well-specified

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3921 --- Comment #2 from Jerry Quinn 2010-03-11 15:21:50 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Quoting the spec: > > "In order to be executed at compile time, the function must appear in a > context > where it must be so executed" > > Note the word

[Issue 3934] New: Some untidy attributes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3934 Summary: Some untidy attributes Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 3851] Array copy error message with no line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3851 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 3933] Array memory allocation error lacks a line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3933 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3914 --- Comment #1 from Don 2010-03-11 12:51:37 PST --- Here's a slightly reduced test case which doesn't require any compiler flags. Not a regression, fails even on DMD0.165. It's a problem with variadic function parameters and fastpar arguments.

[Issue 3933] New: Array memory allocation error lacks a line number

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3933 Summary: Array memory allocation error lacks a line number Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: no

[Issue 3808] Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3808 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code CC|

[Issue 3867] Regression(1.051): forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, and is()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3867 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|pragma(msg) with a forward |Regression(1.051): forward |ref

[Issue 3932] New: Title: A forward declaration error with a struct.init

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3932 Summary: Title: A forward declaration error with a struct.init Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze 2010-03-11 05:42:04 PST --- Somehow I could not reproduce it with this test case, but it still happened with the larger project that showed the problem to begin with. After applying your fix, it back up and

[Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 --- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-03-11 05:11:55 PST --- See my fix as identified in bug 3930 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Co

[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3929 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 3884] Segfault: defining a typedef with an invalid object.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3884 Matti Niemenmaa changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Summar

[Issue 3884] Segfault: typedef present when passing array in tuple argument to function template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3884 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don 2

[Issue 3920] Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3919] ICE(expression.c, 9944): * or / with typedef ireal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3919 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|