[Issue 859] float vector codegen after inlining very different from manual inlined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=859 --- Comment #8 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-07-11 09:05:03 PDT --- This was fixed by the changes that fixed bug 2008. This report passes static arrays as a parameter which was one of the things that caused the inliner to reject

[Issue 859] float vector codegen after inlining very different from manual inlined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=859 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 --- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-07-11 11:31:38 PDT --- Ok. I'll keep that in mind. One step at a time for now though; need to get _any_ delegate inlining to happen before worrying about popping up the layers up to

[Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 --- Comment #6 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-07-11 13:22:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Ok. I'll keep that in mind. One step at a time for now though; need to get _any_ delegate inlining to happen before worrying about

[Issue 4440] inlined delegates produces different asm than straight lined code

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 --- Comment #7 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-07-11 14:39:39 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=690) add support for inlining function literals This patch adds support for inlining function literals. This won't cover many cases

[Issue 4448] New: labeled break doesn't work in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4448 Summary: labeled break doesn't work in CTFE Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2834 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 2834] Struct Destructors are not called by the GC, but called on explicit delete.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2834 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-07-11 17:24:58 PDT --- One case where struct destructors are not called, in this situation it seems simpler for the GC to know what destructors to call: import core.memory: GC; import

[Issue 2971] map no longer works with to

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2971 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4397 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|D1 const/CTFE does not work |const/CTFE does not work ---