[Issue 5343] dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 5343] dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 --- Comment #3 from Don 2010-12-11 21:57:14 PST --- Seems to have just been fixed in svn 798. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 5343] dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 --- Comment #2 from Don 2010-12-11 21:46:31 PST --- Reduces test case: struct Tuple(Specs...) { Specs[0] field; } struct S(E) { immutable E x; // Workaround: Remove immutable. } enum A{a,b,c} // Workaround: alias int

[Issue 5326] GC -- 99% CPU in gc@gcx@Gcx@mark()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5326 --- Comment #5 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2010-12-11 18:53:51 PST --- Ah, all right, thank you for the information! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 5343] dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Issue 5343] New: dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5343 Summary: dmd crashes by the use of template with -g compiler switch Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: criti

[Issue 5342] New: std.array does not respect immutable/const string qualifiers using front/back/etc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5342 Summary: std.array does not respect immutable/const string qualifiers using front/back/etc Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 5329] Simple logging facility in the stdlib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5329 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Nicholson-Sauls 2010-12-11 00:57:42 PST --- If it's renamed to 'std.logging' then the obvious alternate-name for a future replacement would be 'std.logger' -- or vice versa. At any rate, I'll concede that eithe

[Issue 481] Letting compiler determine length for fixed-length arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-12-11 00:35:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't quite get this argument. Originally array literals used to create fixed length arrays: auto a = [1,2,3,4]; ==> int[4] Later D was changed

[Issue 3905] Wrong error message with wrong opBinary("in")

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3905 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-12-11 00:20:31 PST --- Saying that double has no "in" is correct (even if it's a bit noisy and overkill), while saying "rvalue of in expression must be an associative array, not Group" is wrong. I

[Issue 5329] Simple logging facility in the stdlib

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5329 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com