[Issue 5626] std.random unittest disabled

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5626 Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5631] New: Large Address Aware

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5631 Summary: Large Address Aware Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Optlink

[Issue 5632] New: replace() not evaluatable at compile-time anymore

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 Summary: replace() not evaluatable at compile-time anymore Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity:

[Issue 5373] Regression (2.051) CTFE and std.string.replace() causes Bad binary function q{a == b}..

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5373 --- Comment #8 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-02-21 08:16:16 PST --- Well, as of 2.052 replace() has moved to std.array and can't be called at compile-time anymore at all cause of Appender using pointers. I've opened a new report:

[Issue 5632] replace() not evaluatable at compile-time anymore

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 5633] New: (constfold.c): pointer is null

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633 Summary: (constfold.c): pointer is null Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 5632] replace() not evaluatable at compile-time anymore

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5632 --- Comment #2 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-02-21 10:25:05 PST --- Yeah, I know it is no requirement. On the other hand you could also see it as a regression since replace was CTFE-able before ;) But I agree, string functions should be

[Issue 5631] Large Address Aware

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5631 Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2837] OPTLINK and LARGEADDRESSAWARE

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2837 Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com

[Issue 5633] (constfold.c): pointer is null

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 5633] (constfold.c): pointer is null

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5633 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |ice-on-valid-code

[Issue 4640] nothrow before nested function signature doesn't compile

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4640 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #2

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #5

[Issue 5634] New: ICE on Mac OS X when there are multiple 'main's

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5634 Summary: ICE on Mac OS X when there are multiple 'main's Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 --- Comment #6 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 11:50:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) On the other hand, bearophile's 2nd program now result in ICE (at least on Mac OS X) Internal error: ../ztc/machobj.c 1805 Never mind, it ICE only

[Issue 5635] New: Code inside 'foreach' cannot modify variable out of its scope in a template function.

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5635 Summary: Code inside 'foreach' cannot modify variable out of its scope in a template function. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status:

[Issue 4640] nothrow before nested function signature doesn't compile

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4640 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5006] 'pure' unenforced in a nested function

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5637] New: Anonymous structs/unions should have their own context

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5637 Summary: Anonymous structs/unions should have their own context Product: D Version: D1 D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 5636] Array ops broken for comparisons

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-21 15:18:58 PST --- Thank you for adding this bug report/enhancement request, I was going to add it myself in a day or two :-) -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 5636] Array ops broken for comparisons

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 5636] Array ops broken for comparisons

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636 --- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 14:27:41 PST --- Actually, thinking about this some more, I see what is wrong. It is actually doing: bool tmp = a[] b[]; c[] = tmp; I am not sure about the details of

[Issue 3816] Array op: sum and assign to not initialized array

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3816 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5636] New: Array ops broken for comparisons

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5636 Summary: Array ops broken for comparisons Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Issue 2547] Array Ops should check length, at least when bounds checking is on

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2547 --- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2011-02-21 14:36:08 PST --- *** Issue 3816 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 5638] New: Auto-flattening std.range.chain()

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5638 Summary: Auto-flattening std.range.chain() Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 5623] Slow GC with large heaps

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 --- Comment #9 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-21 16:12:54 PST --- Here's another benchmark. This one's designed more to be similar to reasonably common scientific computing/large allocation intensive use cases with moderately

[Issue 2436] Unexpected OPTLINK termination EIP = 00425303 with /co

2011-02-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED