[Issue 5835] Class array's TypeInfo.getHash doesn't work correctly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5835 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-04-11 22:55:45 PDT --- Changed. - Removing getInternalTypeInfo is too strict. - Changed internal TypeInfo of class array - typeid(Object[]) - TypeInfo_AC is only used for TypeInfo class of typeid(user class array). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4048] [CTFE] struct initializer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4048 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-04-12 00:18:00 PDT --- The rejects-valid aspect of this bug is a duplicate of bug 3792. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 693] 'this' can't be used as an alias parameter for a mixin
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=693
Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 01:57:39
PDT ---
This also a problem for non-mixin templates:
struct MyCallable {
int opCall( int n ) {
return n;
}
auto mapthis( int[] arr ) {
return map!this( arr );
}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1309] sorting arrays of structs is broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC||k.hara...@gmail.com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 02:36:01 PDT ---
On trunk dmd, this code works.
import std.stdio;
import std.random;
struct MyStruct
{
uint field;
//int opCmp(MyStruct* m)
int opCmp(ref const(MyStruct) m) const
{
writeln(This is opCmp);
return field - m.field;
}
}
void main()
{
MyStruct[] structs;
for(int i=0;i50;i++)
structs ~= MyStruct(50-i);
structs.sort;
foreach(s;structs)
writeln(s.field);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 693] 'this' can't be used as an alias parameter for a mixin
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=693
--- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 03:01:10
PDT ---
Thinking about this some more, fixing this bug could lead to safer array
indexing for one, through a limited system of dependent types:
struct SafeArray( T ) {
T[] data;
struct Index( alias arr ) {
size_t idx;
// Add safety checks, overflow handling, etc.
}
Index!this makeIndex( size_t n ) {
typeof( return ) result;
result.idx = n;
return result;
}
T opIndex( Index!this idx ) {
return data[idx.idx];
}
}
unittest {
SafeArray!int arr;
arr.data = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0];
auto idx = arr.makeIndex( 3 );
writeln( arr[idx] ); // Completely safe indexing of array, enforced by type
system.
}
There may be a problem in that compiler considers 'this' a local parameter to a
non-global template, which is currently illegal. Not sure how much of a problem
this might be in practice.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3916] opEquals for objects does not respect const
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3916 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||k.hara...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 03:13:52 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 1824 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1824] Object not const correct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schvei...@yahoo.com --- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 03:13:52 PDT --- *** Issue 3916 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1824] Object not const correct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 --- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 06:35:27 PDT --- Just a note regarding bug 3916, the issue extends into the global opEquals function for object, it must also be const correct. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5821] Calling spawn in std.concurrency without all the parameters required by void function(T) fn
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5821
Andriy andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Andriy andr...@gmail.com 2011-04-12 08:55:29 PDT ---
Seems more like it's language:
arg: 100
arg: 134851556 (any number actually)
is printed by the following which should not compile:
import std.stdio;
void func(int value){
writeln(arg: ,value);
}
void myspawn(T...)( void function(T) fn, T args ){
fn(args);
}
void main(){
myspawn(func,100);
myspawn(func);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3650] functions are considered pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3650 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-04-12 11:15:01 PDT --- void function() foo; declares foo as a function pointer. is(T T2 : T2*) matches a pointer, and sets T2 to whatever is pointed to. Hence what is printed out is correct. Not a bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5780] [patch] std.traits.hasIndirections incorrectly handles static arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5780 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||dsim...@yahoo.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 16:14:07 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/3edf3bf1b77ef883676332aea4fe3d8d6ccba867 I didn't include the hasIndirectionsUnittest stuff, though, because it seems to cause weird linker errors when -unittest is enabled, for reasons I don't understand. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5333] simple use of filter (from online doc) does not compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5333 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||dsim...@yahoo.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 16:26:10 PDT --- This appears to have been fixed in Git but not marked as such. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5838] New: splitter and split names
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5838 Summary: splitter and split names Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-12 17:18:57 PDT --- From benchmarks I've seen that std.array.splitter() is often more efficient than std.array.split(), probably because splitter doesn't allocate memory for the array. Python programmers (and maybe other programmers) are used to use split(), despite often splitter() is enough for their purposes. The splitter name is longer than split, but it's better to suggest D programmers (and D programmes coming from Python) to use splitter() on default instead of split(). So I suggest to give a shorter name to the lazy generator, and a longer name to the function that returns an array. This is also more aligned to the naming in std.algorithm where the short function names (like map and filter) are for the lazy versions. In bug 5756 I have suggested to add amap/afilter that approximately mean array(map())/array(filter()). So the lazy splitter may be named just split and the one that generates an array (that's similar to array(split())) may be named asplit (if you want the prefix a may also be seen as the prefix of the aeger word, instead of array). So my renaming suggestions are: split() == asplit() splitter() == split() -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5756] amap() and maybe afilter() too
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5756 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-12 17:19:56 PDT --- See also bug 5838 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5474] unaryFun byRef is borked for custom parameter name
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5474 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||dsim...@yahoo.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 17:29:33 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/1578be026e5a8c99036b41e01dafc857205bc2d7 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5538] Immutable classes can't be passed as messages in std.concurrency
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5538 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 17:41:07 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/325a8fe64a15c57dcde3f8326ad35cfd638f86c7 Fixed the Rebindable part. Hopefully the Variant part will be fixed with Rob Jacques's upcoming Variant update. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5170] std.algorithm.copy works for non-assignable ranges
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5170 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-04-12 17:44:35 PDT --- This one looks to have been fixed a long time ago but never closed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5839] New: No error line number with did you mean of private symbol
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5839
Summary: No error line number with did you mean of private
symbol
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-12 18:21:06 PDT ---
D2 program:
import std.random;
void main() {
int[int] aa;
aa[seep] ~= 0;
}
DMD 2.052 shows an error without line number:
test.d: Error: module test std.random.seed is private
test.d(4): Error: undefined identifier seep, did you mean variable seed?
Marked as critical because Don asked me to do this in a comment of bug 5745
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
